...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing >AGRICULTURAL PRICE POLICY IN INDIA: HAS IT BENEFITTED PADDY FARMERS?
【24h】

AGRICULTURAL PRICE POLICY IN INDIA: HAS IT BENEFITTED PADDY FARMERS?

机译:印度的农业价格政策:它是水稻种植的受益者吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Markets for agricultural produces in India are mostly unorganized and distorted where farmers are often scrupulously exploited. Also since the elasticity of demand for agricultural commodities particularly foodgrains is less than unit in most cases, increased production during the period of pumper harvest brings down the prices of agricultural commodities sharply that severely harms the farmers. Keeping this in view, the support price scheme has been implemented on a regular basis for paddy and othercrops since 1965 in India. However, the support price provided to paddy has come under severe scrutiny and attack for various reasons in recent years. Farmers have been demanding for higher support price for paddy citing that the support price is not even adequate to cover the cost of cultivation. On the other hand, some economists argue that increase of paddy price is “dirty economics and dirtier politics ”. Since paddy is the majorfoodgrain crop supporting the livelihood of large number of farmersbesides helping to sustain the food security of India, an attempt is made in this study to answers the questions such as: Has the support price scheme helped the paddy cultivating farmers in terms of increasing their income? What is the trend in supportprice of paddy vis-a-vis other crops? Has the trend in support price of paddy changed in the recent years given the increased cost of cultivation? What is the level of procurement of paddy at the national and across the states in India? Is it correct tosay that the support price is not remunerative to paddy farmers belonging to high and low productivity states? Secondary level data from 1965-66 to 2010-11 has been used for this study.
机译:印度的农产品市场大多是无组织的和扭曲的,那里农民经常受到严格的剥削。同样,由于在大多数情况下对农产品特别是粮食谷物的需求弹性小于单位,因此在抽水机收割期间增加的产量使农产品价格急剧下跌,严重损害了农民。考虑到这一点,自1965年以来,印度一直定期对稻谷和其他农作物实施支持价格计划。然而,近年来,由于各种原因,提供给稻谷的支持价格受到了严格的审查和攻击。农民一直在要求更高的稻谷支持价格,理由是支持价格甚至不足以支付耕种成本。另一方面,一些经济学家认为,稻谷价格上涨是“肮脏的经济学和肮脏的政治”。由于稻米是主要的粮食作物,可支持大量农民的生计,有助于维持印度的粮食安全,因此,本研究试图回答以下问题:支持价格计划是否在以下方面帮助稻米种植农民:增加他们的收入?水稻对其他作物的支持价格趋势如何?鉴于种植成本的增加,近年来稻谷支持价格的趋势有没有改变?印度全国和各邦的稻米采购水平是多少?正确的说法是,支持价格对属于高生产率国家和低生产率国家的稻农没有好处吗?这项研究使用了1965-66年至2010-11年的中学数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号