首页> 外文期刊>IIE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors >Selecting the Optimal Sheeting-Font Combination to Increase the Visibility of Roadway Guide Signs in the Presence of Glare
【24h】

Selecting the Optimal Sheeting-Font Combination to Increase the Visibility of Roadway Guide Signs in the Presence of Glare

机译:选择最佳的覆盖字体-字体组合以增加在眩光情况下巷道引导标志的可见性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Driver safety remains an important issue, and improving roadway guide sign visibility is an important step in increasing safety on roadways and thus reducing crashes. Currently, two types of retroreflective sheeting materials (type IV and type XI) and either Series E (Modified) or ClearviewHwy font types are used for signs in the United States. Glare from an oncoming vehicle's low beam headlights, however, can create visual difficulty for drivers at night. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of two retroreflective sheeting materials and two font types, for use on shoulder-mounted guide signs (i.e., mounted on the shoulder of a roadway) in the presence of glare. Methods: Four sheeting-font combinations, involving type IV and type XI sheeting materials and Series E (Modified) and ClearviewHwy fonts were compared in a field experiment. Participants were asked to read the legend of four signs during nighttime driving, in the presence of glare from an oncoming low beam headlight vehicle. The legibility distance at which the participant read the sign was recorded as the dependent variable. A cost comparison was also performed for the four signs. Results: Type XI sheeting combined with ClearviewHwy font provided the maximum legibility distance. The cost analysis showed that type XI was less expensive over a 60-year timeframe (~9.3% lower) versus type IV. Conclusions: Use of type XI sheeting and ClearviewHwy font is recommended for shoulder-mounted roadway signs to enhance legibility. However, future work is needed to verify these results under more general conditions and with a broader range of participants.
机译:背景:驾驶员安全仍然是一个重要问题,并且提高道路引导标志的可见度是提高道路安全性并从而减少事故的重要一步。当前,在美国,标志使用两种类型的逆反射片材料(IV型和XI型)和E系列(改进型)或ClearviewHwy字体类型。但是,迎面驶来的车辆的近光大灯会产生眩光,这会在夜间为驾驶员带来视觉障碍。目的:本研究的目的是评估在有眩光的情况下用于肩上安装的导向标志(即,安装在道路的肩上)的两种逆反射片材和两种字体类型的性能。方法:在现场实验中,比较了涉及IV型和XI型薄片材料以及Series E(修改版)和ClearviewHwy字体的四种薄片字体组合。要求参与者在夜间驾驶时要面对四个标志的传说,这是在即将来临的近光头灯车辆产生眩光的情况下。参与者读取标志的易读距离被记录为因变量。还对这四个标志进行了成本比较。结果:XI型薄片与ClearviewHwy字体结合使用可提供最大的可读距离。成本分析表明,与IV型相比,XI型在60年的时间范围内价格更低(降低了9.3%)。结论:建议在肩上安装的道路标志上使用XI型覆盖物和ClearviewHwy字体,以提高可读性。但是,需要在更一般的条件下和更广泛的参与者中验证这些结果的未来工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号