首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery >Analysis of a radiographic assessment method of acetabular cover in developmental dysplasia of the hip.
【24h】

Analysis of a radiographic assessment method of acetabular cover in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

机译:髋臼覆盖在髋关节发育不良中的放射学评估方法的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The aim of this study was to analyse a radiographic assessment method of acetabular cover (Ogata et al.) in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities of the method were found to be 'substantial' (agreement ratio 85, kappa coefficient 0.76) and 'moderate' (agreement ratio 71, kappa coefficient 0.54), respectively. The percentage of hips considered pathological was significantly higher following the use of the acetabular roof shape classification system (15) than following the measurement of the centre-edge (CE) angle of Wiberg (3) in the same hips ( p=0.000). The average CE angle of Ogata values of types 12, 3 and 4 acetabula were significantly different, whereas the CE angle of Wiberg ones were not. It was concluded that this classification system was a reliable and reproducible radiological indicator for reflecting the acetabular cover. A careful assessment is needed in types 3 and 4 acetabula, because the use of classical angle measurements on plain radiographs such as the CE angle of Wiberg may carry the risk of overestimation of the radiological hip anatomy in such hips.
机译:本研究的目的是分析髋臼覆盖物(Ogata 等人)在髋关节发育不良 (DDH) 中的放射学评估方法。该方法的观察者内和观察者间可靠性分别为“实质性”(一致性率 85%,kappa 系数 0.76)和“中等”(一致性率 71%,kappa 系数 0.54)。使用髋臼屋顶形状分类系统后,被认为病态的髋关节百分比 (15%) 明显高于在同一髋关节中测量 Wiberg 中心边缘 (CE) 角 (3%) 后 ( p=0.000)。1&2型、3型和4型髋臼的绪方平均CE角差异显著,而Wiberg型的CE角则没有显著差异。得出的结论是,该分类系统是反映髋臼盖的可靠且可重复的放射学指标。3 型和 4 型髋臼需要仔细评估,因为在 X 线平片(例如 Wiberg 的 CE 角)上使用经典的角度测量可能会高估此类髋关节的放射学髋关节解剖结构。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号