THREE-DIMENSIONAL HEAD-UP DISPLAY VERSUS STANDARD OPERATING MICROSCOPE FOR VITRECTOMY SURGERY A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of vitrectomy with three-dimensional head-up display (3D HUD) versus standard operating microscopy (SOM) for retinal diseases. Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were comprehensively searched to identify studies that compared 3D HUD versus SOM in vitrectomy for retinal diseases (PROSPERO protocol CRD42021265827). The primary outcomes are duration of surgical time, postoperative best-corrected visual acuity, endoillumination levels, and intraoperative complications. The secondary outcomes are reattachment rate of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, macular hole closure rate, and the like. Results: Fifteen studies of 2,889 eyes were included. Compared with SOM, 3D HUD vitrectomy took a longer surgical time (weighted mean difference = 1.48; 95 confidence interval, 0.13-2.82), but it needed lower endoillumination levels (weighted mean difference = -16.04, 95 confidence interval, -18.33 to -13.75) than SOM. There were no significant differences in the postoperative best-corrected visual acuity, intraoperative complications, reattachment rate of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, or closure rate of macular hole. Conclusion: Our results suggested that 3D HUD provides lower retinal illumine toxicities but with a longer surgical time. The surgical results and complications of vitrectomy were equally comparable for 3D HUD and SOM.