Bivalirudin vs. heparin in paediatric and adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A meta‐analysis

摘要

Aims Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the primary anticoagulant of choice on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, it is debatable whether bivalirudin (BIV), a direct thrombin inhibitor, may be considered a better alternative anticoagulant option. Methods We searched Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane library, Clinicaltrials.gov, CNKI and Wanfang databases up to 15 June 2021. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were considered eligible for inclusion. Random‐effects meta‐analyses, including subgroup analyses, were conducted. Results A total of 9 studies containing 994 patients were enrolled. All articles were retrospective cohort studies. Compared with UFH, BIV was associated with lower risks of major bleeding (risk ratio RR: 0.32, 95 confidence interval CI 0.22–0.49), ECMO in‐circuit thrombosis (RR: 0.57, 95 CI 0.43–0.74), stroke (RR: 0.52, 95 CI 0.29–0.95) and in‐hospital mortality (RR: 0.82, 95 CI 0.69–0.99), and higher rates of survival to ECMO decannulation (RR: 1.18, 95 CI 1.03–1.34). Pooled risk estimates did not show a significant association with clinical thrombotic events (RR: 0.69, 95 CI 0.45–1.07). Moreover, BIV was associated with a lower risk of ECMO in‐circuit thrombosis and in‐hospital mortality in the adult subgroup but not in the paediatric subgroup. However, leave‐one‐out sensitivity analyses indicated that the results of stroke, survival to ECMO decannulation and in‐hospital mortality should be interpreted with caution. Conclusion BIV appears to be a potential alternative to UFH in paediatric and adult patients requiring ECMO.