首页> 外文期刊>Auto Engineer Australasia >AAT hands down ACIS decision on Australian based and off-shore R&D
【24h】

AAT hands down ACIS decision on Australian based and off-shore R&D

机译:AAT否决了ACIS关于澳大利亚和离岸研发的决定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Administrative Appeal Tribunal recently handed down a decision in favour of AusIndustry regarding what constitutes Australian based and off-shore R&D, within the meaning of the ACIS Legislation and Regulations. The findings in this case equally apply to R&D claims under the new ATS Scheme. The decision was handed down following an appeal to the AAT by Robert Bosch Australia Pty Ltd. The principal issue in this review concerned the interpretation of Regulations 13G (5)(a) and 13G (5)(c) of the ACIS Administration Regulations 2000. In particular, the point was whether the activities undertaken overseas by the applicant's parent company (and its contractors) could, in the context of the Act and Regulations, be said to be "conducted by" the applicant (Bosch). On behalf of the applicant, it was submitted that regs 13G(a) and (c) concern who undertakes (referring to the definition of "Australian based research and development" in reg 3) or conducts the R&D, not where the R&D occurs.
机译:行政上诉法庭最近根据ACIS立法和法规,就AUSIndustry构成澳大利亚和离岸研发的内容作出了有利于澳大利亚的裁决。在这种情况下,调查结果同样适用于新的ATS计划下的R&D索赔。该决定是在Robert Bosch Australia Pty Ltd向AAT提出上诉之后作出的。此次审查的主要问题涉及ACIS 2000年行政法规第13G(5)(a)和13G(5)(c)条的解释。尤其要指出的是,在该法案和实施细则的范围内,可以认为申请人的母公司(及其承包商)在海外开展的活动是由申请人(博世)“进行”的。代表申请人提出,第13G(a)和(c)条涉及的是从事(而不是在发生R&D的地方)进行(指第3条中“基于澳大利亚的研究与开发”的定义)或进行R&D的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号