首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. >Retraction: Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor-type O (PTPRO) exhibits characteristics of a candidate tumor suppressor in human lung cancer (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2004) 101 (13844-13849) ^i10.1073/pnas.0405451101)
【24h】

Retraction: Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor-type O (PTPRO) exhibits characteristics of a candidate tumor suppressor in human lung cancer (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2004) 101 (13844-13849) ^i10.1073/pnas.0405451101)

机译:Retraction: Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor-type O (PTPRO) exhibits characteristics of a candidate tumor suppressor in human lung cancer (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2004) 101 (13844-13849) ^i10.1073/pnas.0405451101)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Retraction for “Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor-type O (PTPRO) exhibits characteristics of a candidate tumor suppressor in human lung cancer,” by Tasneem Motiwala, Huban Kutay, Kalpana Ghoshal, Shoumei Bai, Hiroyuki Seimiya, Takashi Tsuruo, Saul Suster, Carl Morrison, and Samson T. Jacob, which was first published September 8, 2004; 10.1073/pnas.0405451101 (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 13844–13849). The authors1 note the following: “For 18 years, our study was considered to be the first to demonstrate methylationmediated suppression of PTPRO in human tumors and its tumor suppressor potential. However, due to recent events we believe that the responsible course of action is to retract the paper. Following an investigation, The Ohio State University identified evidence of duplicated data in Figs. 2 and 5A. Their findings include: ‘In Figure 2, the reuse of the same data in the 18S rRNA blot in lanes 1 and 2 and in lanes 7 and 8, and also in lanes 3 and 4, (with a horizontal mirror image). Figure 2 also includes the false labeling of normal (N) and tumor (T) matched pairs #3 and #4 when compared to the original RT-PCR research record. In Figure 5A, the reuse of the same data for serum starved images for both A549/vector and A549/PTPRO.’ Although we have the raw data to demonstrate the accuracy of Fig. 2 and submit a correction, we do not have access to the raw data for Fig. 5A. We stand by the reproducibility of the experimental data and the conclusions of the paper because the microscopic image in Fig. 5A was only a representative field of the several fields that were counted to provide the quantitative data in Fig. 5B, and we believe that the conclusions drawn from this figure have been validated by the thymidine block experiment (Figs. 5A, Bottom and 5B) and colony formation in soft agar (Fig. 4C )”. ? 2022 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号