首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Three‐dimensional‐guided and ICE‐guided transseptal puncture for cardiac ablations: A propensity score match study
【24h】

Three‐dimensional‐guided and ICE‐guided transseptal puncture for cardiac ablations: A propensity score match study

机译:用于心脏消融的三维引导和 ICE 引导的经鼻中隔穿刺:倾向评分匹配研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Introduction Transseptal puncture (TSP) is routinely performed for left atrial ablation procedures. The use of a three‐dimensional (3D) mapping system or intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is useful in localizing the fossa ovalis and reducing fluoroscopy use. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy between 3D mapping system‐guided TSP and ICE‐guided TSP techniques. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study of patients undergoing TSP for left atrial catheter ablation procedures (mostly atrial fibrillation ablation). Propensity scoring was used to match patients undergoing 3D‐guided TSP with patients undergoing ICE‐guided TSP. Logistic regression was used to compare the clinical data, procedural data, fluoroscopy time, success rate, and complications between the groups. Results ?Sixty‐five patients underwent 3D‐guided TSP, and 151 propensity score‐matched patients underwent ICE‐guided TSP. The TSP success rate was 100 in both the 3D‐guided and ICE‐guided groups. Median needle time was 4.00?min (interquartile range?IQR: 2.57–5.08) in patients with 3D‐guided TSP compared to 4.02?min (IQR: 2.83–6.95) in those with ICE‐guided TSP (p?=?.22). Mean fluoroscopy time was 0.2?min (IQR: 0.1–0.4) in patients with 3D‐guided TSP compared to 1.2?min (IQR: 0.7–2.2) in those with ICE‐guided TSP (p?
机译:摘要 引言 经鼻中隔穿刺(TSP)是左心房消融手术的常规行法。使用三维 (3D) 标测系统或心内超声心动图 (ICE) 有助于定位卵圆窝和减少透视的使用。我们旨在比较 3D 映射系统引导的 TSP 和 ICE 引导的 TSP 技术之间的安全性和有效性。方法 对接受TSP左心房导管消融术(多为心房颤动消融术)的患者进行前瞻性观察性研究。倾向评分用于将接受 3D 引导的 TSP 患者与接受 ICE 引导的 TSP 的患者进行匹配,采用 Logistic 回归比较组间的临床资料、程序资料、透视时间、成功率和并发症。结果?65 例患者接受了 3D 引导的 TSP,151 例倾向评分匹配的患者接受了 ICE 引导的 TSP。3D引导组和ICE引导组的TSP成功率为100%。中位针时间为4.00?min(四分位距?[IQR]:2.57-5.08)与ICE引导TSP患者的4.02?min(IQR:2.83-6.95)相比(p?=?。22). 3D 引导 TSP 患者的平均透视时间为 0.2?min (IQR: 0.1–0.4),而 ICE 引导 TSP 患者的平均透视时间为 1.2?min (IQR: 0.7–2.2) (p?.001)两组均无TSP相关并发症。结论 三维映射引导的TSP与ICE引导的TSP一样安全有效,无需额外成本。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号