...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of hydrogen energy >System-level comparison of ammonia, compressed and liquid hydrogen as fuels for polymer electrolyte fuel cell powered shipping
【24h】

System-level comparison of ammonia, compressed and liquid hydrogen as fuels for polymer electrolyte fuel cell powered shipping

机译:System-level comparison of ammonia, compressed and liquid hydrogen as fuels for polymer electrolyte fuel cell powered shipping

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With the aim to reduce emissions from marine transport, electric propulsion systems for a water taxi and container ship powered by a hydrogen polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell system are designed and analyzed compared to the current fuel-oil engine systems in terms of system energy and exergy efficiency, fuel consumption, mass and volume, environmental impacts and cost. Hydrogen is stored either as a compressed gas (GH(2)), cryogenic liquid (LH2) or produced from liquid ammonia (LNH3) and can deliver 91,91 and 88 greenhouse gas reductions, respectively. All hydrogen sources fit within ship volume and mass constraints apart from GH(2) in the cargo ship. In the absence of carbon policy measures, the costs over a 25-year system life are 108 (GH(2)), 112 (LH2), 116 (LNH3) greater for the container ship and 43 (GH(2)), 105 (LNH3) greater for the water taxi. A carbon tax of 75-191 pound/tonne CO(2)eq would allow the low carbon options to become cost competitive. (C) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号