首页> 外文期刊>Annals of science >Against the science-religion conflict: The genesis of a Calvinist science faculty in the Netherlands in the early twentieth century
【24h】

Against the science-religion conflict: The genesis of a Calvinist science faculty in the Netherlands in the early twentieth century

机译:反对科学与宗教的冲突:20世纪初荷兰加尔文主义科学学院的起源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper gives an account of the establishment and expansion of a Faculty of Science at the Calvinist 'Free University' in the Netherlands in the 1930s. It describes the efforts of a group of orthodox Christians to come to terms with the natural sciences in the early twentieth century. The statutes of the university, which had been founded in 1880, prescribed that all research and teaching should be based on Calvinist, biblical principles. This ideal was formulated in opposition to the claim of nineteenth-century scientific naturalists that there was an inherent conflict between science and religion. However, despite their selection on the basis of their strict Calvinist beliefs, the first science professors attributed a certain independence to the domain of science. They agreed with the criticism of the conflict thesis, and tried to defuse the tensions between science and religion, although mainly at the level of philosophy and history, looking for example for harmony between science and religion in the past. Ironically, as a result of this approach, the Calvinist scientists mainly contributed to the acceptance of mainstream science in Dutch Calvinist circles, contrary to developments in other countries (notably the USA) where the conflict between science and orthodox Christianity has reasserted itself.
机译:本文介绍了1930年代荷兰Calvinist“自由大学”的科学学院的建立和扩展。它描述了一群正统的基督徒在20世纪初努力适应自然科学的努力。成立于1880年的大学章程规定,所有研究和教学都应基于加尔文主义的圣经原则。提出这一理想是与19世纪的科学博物学家声称科学与宗教之间存在内在冲突相对立的。但是,尽管他们是根据严格的加尔文主义信仰选择的,但第一批科学教授还是将一定的独立性归因于科学领域。他们同意对冲突论的批评,并试图化解科学与宗教之间的紧张关系,尽管主要是在哲学和历史层面,以寻求过去科学与宗教之间的和谐为例。具有讽刺意味的是,作为这种方法的结果,加尔文主义的科学家们主要为在荷兰加尔文主义圈子中接受主流科学做出了贡献,这与其他国家(特别是美国)的发展相反,在这些国家,科学与正统基督教之间的冲突再次得到了肯定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号