Towards developing a Core Outcome Set for malnutrition intervention studies in older adults: a scoping review to identify frequently used research outcomes

摘要

Purpose To conduct a scoping review to provide a systematic overview of outcomes used in nutritional intervention studies focused on the treatment of protein-energy malnutrition in older adults. Methods A systematic search of four electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was performed to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published until March 9, 2020, that evaluated the effect of nutritional interventions to treat protein-energy malnutrition in older adults and those at risk for malnutrition. Two authors screened titles, abstracts and full texts independently. One author extracted data that were cross-checked by another author. Results Sixty-three articles reporting 60 RCTs were identified. Most frequently used outcomes included body weight/body mass index (75.0 of RCTs), dietary intake (61.7), functional limitations (48.3), handgrip strength (46.7), and body circumference (40.0). The frequencies differed by setting (community, hospital and long-term care). For some outcomes there was a preferred assessment method (e.g., Barthel index for functional limitations), while for other outcomes (e.g., functional performance) a much greater variation was observed. Conclusion A large variation in outcomes, not only across but also within settings, was identified in nutritional intervention studies in malnourished older adults and those at risk. Furthermore, for many outcomes there was a large variation in the used assessment method. These results highlight the need for developing a Core Outcome Set for malnutrition intervention studies in older adults to facilitate future meta-analyses that may enhance our understanding on the effectiveness of treatment. Key Summary PointsAim As a first step in developing a Core Outcome Set, we performed a scoping review using a systematic methodology to identify used outcomes in nutritional intervention studies in malnourished older adults and those at risk. Findings A large variation in used outcomes and primary outcomes was identified, with considerable differences in the frequency of outcomes between settings. For most outcomes no preferred assessment method could be recognised. Message A large heterogeneity in used outcomes and methods to assess outcomes was observed, highlighting the need to develop a Core Outcome Set in order to facilitate future evidence syntheses (e.g. meta-analyses).