首页> 外文期刊>Australian and New Zealand journal of public health. >Closing the Gaps: Competing estimates of Indigenous Australian life expectancy in the scientific literature
【24h】

Closing the Gaps: Competing estimates of Indigenous Australian life expectancy in the scientific literature

机译:缩小差距:科学文献中对澳大利亚土著人的预期寿命的估算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Closing the gap in life expectancy between Indigenous and other Australians within a generation is central to national Indigenous reform policy (Closing the Gap). Over time, various methods of estimating Indigenous life expectancy and with that, the life expectancy gap, have been adopted with differing, albeit non-comparable results. We present data on the extent of the gap and elucidate the pattern of use and interpretations of the different estimates of the gap, between 2007 and 2012. Methods: An extensive search was conducted for all peer-reviewed health publications citing estimates of and/or discussing the life expectancy of Indigenous Australians, for the period 2007-2012. Results: Five predominant patterns of citation of the gap estimates were identified: 20 years, 17 years, 15-20 years, 13 years, and 11.5 years for males and 9.7 years for females. Some authors misinterpret the most recent estimates as reflecting improvement from the 17-year figure, rather than the result of different methods of estimation. Support for the direct methods used to calculate Indigenous life expectancy is indicated. Conclusions and Implications: A specific estimate of the life expectancy gap has not been established among stakeholders in Indigenous health. Agreement on the magnitude of the gap is arguably needed in order to evaluate strategies aimed at improving health outcomes for Indigenous Australians. Moreover, measuring progress towards 'closing the gap' depends on the availability of comparable estimates, using the same techniques of measurement to assess changes over time.
机译:目标:缩小一代人与其他澳大利亚人之间的预期寿命差距对国家土著改革政策(缩小差距)至关重要。随着时间的流逝,采用了多种估计土著人的预期寿命的方法,并由此得出了预期寿命差距,尽管结果无法比拟,但结果却有所不同。我们提供有关差距程度的数据,并阐明2007年至2012年间差距的不同估计值的使用方式和解释。方法:对所有经过同行评审的卫生出版物进行了广泛搜索,引用了估计值和/或讨论了2007-2012年澳大利亚土著居民的预期寿命。结果:差距估计的五个主要引用模式被确定:男性20年,17年,15-20年,13年和11.5年,女性9.7年。一些作者将最新的估算误解为反映了17年数字的改进,而不是不同估算方法的结果。指出支持用于计算土著人平均寿命的直接方法。结论和启示:土著健康利益相关者之间尚未建立预期寿命差距的具体估计。为了评估旨在改善澳大利亚原住民健康结果的策略,可以说需要就差距的大小达成一致。此外,衡量“缩小差距”的进度取决于可比估计的可用性,即使用相同的衡量技术来评估随时间的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号