首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of Soil Research >Soil assessment of apple orchards under conventional and organic management
【24h】

Soil assessment of apple orchards under conventional and organic management

机译:传统和有机管理下苹果园的土壤评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To determine the effect of wheel traffic and two different management practices on soil compaction and its consequences on physical and chemical soil properties, we measured penetration resistance, water infiltration, bulk density, macroporosity, chemical mobility, air permeability, and soil strength in a conventional orchard (integrated fruit-production program) with bare (sprayed with herbicides) rows and an organic apple orchard with grassed rows. Resistance measurements were taken both within the tree row and the wheel track, down to a depth of 0.35 to 0.40 m. The results indicate that compaction is greater in the wheel tracks under both management methods. Compaction in the wheel track was higher under organic than conventional management. Organic management resulted in a higher macroporosity in both the row and the wheel-track than conventional management. The 'close-to-saturation' infiltration rate was significantly greater within the row of the organic orchard (0.06 m/h) compared with therow of the conventional orchard (0.02 m/h), and compared with the wheel tracks (0.01 m/h). The precompression stress value in the top 100 mm, a measure of the soil strength, was low on all sites. The chemical mobilities were 57 and 50% in the organic orchard, and 86 and 93% in the conventional orchard, respectively, for wheel track and row. Apart from the compaction in the wheel track of the organic orchard, physical and chemical soil characteristics were in a better condition compared with the conventional orchard.
机译:为了确定轮流和两种不同管理方式对土壤压实的影响及其对土壤物理化学性质的影响,我们在常规方法中测量了渗透阻力,水渗透,堆积密度,大孔隙度,化学迁移率,透气性和土壤强度果园(综合的水果生产计划)排成一排(喷洒除草剂),有机苹果园排成一排。在树行和轮迹内都进行了阻力测量,深度一直到0.35至0.40 m。结果表明,在两种管理方法下,轮迹的压实度都更大。在有机方式下,轮迹的压实度要高于传统管理。与常规管理相比,有机管理导致行和轮迹上的大孔率更高。与传统果园的行数(0.02 m / h)以及轮迹(0.01 m / h)相比,有机果园行中的“接近饱和”渗透率(0.06 m / h)明显更高。 H)。在所有位置上,用于测量土壤强度的顶部100毫米的预压缩应力值都很低。在有机果园中,轮迹和划行的化学迁移率分别为57%和50%,在常规果园中分别为86%和93%。除了压实有机果园的轮迹外,与常规果园相比,其物理和化学土壤特性处于更好的状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号