首页> 外文期刊>Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology >What's a proper push? The Valsalva manoeuvre revisited
【24h】

What's a proper push? The Valsalva manoeuvre revisited

机译:什么是适当的推动?瓦尔萨尔瓦的动作再谈

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In daily practice, the Valsalva manoeuvre is used to assess pelvic organ prolapse, virtually always without standardisation of pressure. We undertook a study to determine maximum pressures reached and pressures required to obtain 80% of maximal pelvic organ descent, to investigate the need for such standardisation. Clinical data and ultrasound data sets of 75 women seen for urodynamic testing were reviewed retrospectively, with three Valsalva manoeuvres registered per patient. Maximum rectal pressures generated during Valsalva were 107 cm H 2O on average (range, 45-190 cm H 2O). Ninety-seven percent of all women managed to reach pressures ≥60 cm H 2O. On average, 80% of maximal bladder neck descent was reached at 56 cm H 2O, 80% of maximal pelvic organ descent at 38 cm H 2O. Our results imply that virtually all patients were able to generate pressures resulting in ≥80% of maximal pelvic organ descent. This implies that standardisation of Valsalva pressures for prolapse assessment may be unnecessary.
机译:在日常实践中,瓦尔萨尔瓦(Valsalva)动作通常用于评估骨盆器官的脱垂,而实际上并没有使压力标准化。我们进行了一项研究,以确定达到最大骨盆器官下降的80%所需的最大压力和所需压力,以研究此类标准化的必要性。回顾性地回顾了75例接受尿动力学检查的女性的临床数据和超声数据,每位患者登记了3例Valsalva动作。 Valsalva期间产生的最大直肠压力平均为107 cm H 2O(范围为45-190 cm H 2O)。 97%的女性设法达到≥60 cm H 2O的压力。平均而言,在56 cm H 2O处达到最大膀胱颈下降的80%,在38 cm H 2O处达到最大骨盆器官下降的80%。我们的结果表明,实际上所有患者都能产生压力,导致最大骨盆器官下降≥80%。这意味着用于评估脱垂的瓦尔萨尔瓦压力的标准化可能是不必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号