...
首页> 外文期刊>Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal >EVALUATION OF THE CLINICAL EFFICACY OF THREE MEDICATIONS USED FOR TREATMENT OF EARMITE-INDUCED OTITIS EXTERNA IN CATS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY
【24h】

EVALUATION OF THE CLINICAL EFFICACY OF THREE MEDICATIONS USED FOR TREATMENT OF EARMITE-INDUCED OTITIS EXTERNA IN CATS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY

机译:三种方法治疗迷迭香诱发的中耳外泌蛋白临床疗效评价:初步研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of three different medications (ivermectin injection, canaural eardrops and frontline combo) in treatment of ear mite infestation accompanied by otitis externa in cats using a randomized trial.Cases presented to the Small Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University for investigating signs of ear mite infestation and/or otitis externa were recruited (n=17) and randomly assigned to one of the 3 groups for evaluation of response to treatment over a period of 30 days. Cases that did not respond to treatment within 2 weeks of treatment were changed to one of the other two medication. A simple questionnaire was designed to evaluate owner satisfaction of the medication price, ease of administration, cat tolerance and improvement of signs. Recruited cases were either brought to the clinic for re-evaluation or the owner was contacted by phone to evaluate progress of each case. In the ivermectin-treated group (Group 1; n=7), 75%of cases recovered from ear mite infestation based on signs resolving and disappearance of presenting signs. Only 60% of cases treated with frontline (Group 2) showed an improvement of signs (n=5). All cases treated with Canaural (Group 3) showed complete recovery with complete absence of presenting signs and signs of otitis externa (n=5). Average age of cats in all groups ranged from two to 72 months (mean= 17.33, median=6.5). —Statistically there were no significant difference between the three medications (p>0.5), but according to the clinical findings, we can suggest that Canaural is the most suitable when otitis externa is present along with ear mite infestation. Frontline Combo is not as effective as the two other medications used in this study.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较一项随机试验,比较三种不同药物(伊维菌素注射液,双耳滴耳液和前线联合用药)在猫耳螨感染伴外耳道炎治疗中的临床效果。招募了Assiut大学兽医学院,以调查耳螨侵袭和/或外耳道炎的体征(n = 17),并随机分配到3组中的一组中,以评估30天对治疗的反应。在治疗2周内对治疗无反应的病例改为其他两种药物之一。设计了一个简单的问卷,以评估所有者对药物价格的满意度,给药的简易性,猫的耐受性和体征的改善。被招募的病例要么被带到诊所进行重新评估,要么通过电话联系所有者以评估每个病例的进展。在伊维菌素治疗组(第1组; n = 7)中,有75%的病例因体征消失和体征消失而从耳螨侵袭中恢复。一线治疗的患者中只有60%(第2组)显示出体征改善(n = 5)。所有接受小耳的治疗(第3组)均显示完全康复,完全没有外耳道炎的体征和体征(n = 5)。所有组中猫的平均年龄为2到72个月不等(平均值= 17.33,中位数= 6.5)。 —从统计学上说,三种药物之间没有显着差异(p> 0.5),但是根据临床发现,我们可以建议当存在外耳炎和耳螨侵扰时,双耳是最合适的。前线组合不如本研究中使用的其他两种药物有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号