...
首页> 外文期刊>Australian Dental Journal >The Monitor Practice Programme: is non-invasive management of dental caries in private practice effective?
【24h】

The Monitor Practice Programme: is non-invasive management of dental caries in private practice effective?

机译:监护人实践计划:私人实践中无创管理龋齿是否有效?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: This paper reviews the efficacy of an intensive, preventive-based, non-invasive approach to the management of dental caries within a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: The primary efficacy measure was the two-year DMFS increment. Changes in risk status, fluoride history, number of emergency visits and toothaches, along with demographic variables such as age, gender, health problems, and the location of the dental practice attended were measured. Regression analysis was undertaken to adjust for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: Nine hundred and two patients were recruited within 22 dental practices between May 2005 and March 2006. Baseline DMFS did not differ significantly between the control and study groups (p = 0.83). Age (p < 0.001), health status (p = 0.005), baseline risk (p < 0.001) and fluoride history (p < 0.001) were all independent significant predictors of two-year DMFS increment. Gender approached significance (p = 0.08). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the incidence of toothaches (p = 0.1) or number of treatment visits required (p = 0.35). There was a significant difference in the two-year incremental DMFS score in the study group compared to the control group (mean difference 2.2; p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding variables the difference in the DMFS increment between the control and study groups remained significant (mean difference 1.7; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate efficacy of the preventive programme. Efficacy was independent of age, gender, medical concerns, fluoride history, or previous history of dental caries, in a population of patients attending for treatment in private dental practices, in a variety of locations, on a relatively short-term basis (two years). While encouraging, it will be essential that these results are followed over a longer period of time in order to determine whether the benefits are maintained.
机译:背景:本文回顾了一项基于随机对照试验的强化,预防性,非侵入性方法治疗龋齿的功效。方法:主要功效指标为两年DMFS增量。测量了风险状况,氟化物病史,急诊就诊和牙痛的次数以及人口统计变量(例如年龄,性别,健康问题以及就诊牙科位置)的变化。进行回归分析以调整潜在的混杂变量。结果:2005年5月至2006年3月,在22种牙科实践中共招募了902名患者。基线DMFS在对照组和研究组之间无显着差异(p = 0.83)。年龄(p <0.001),健康状况(p = 0.005),基线风险(p <0.001)和氟化物病史(p <0.001)是两年DMFS升高的独立重要预测因子。性别接近显着性(p = 0.08)。两组之间的牙痛发生率(p = 0.1)或所需的就诊次数(p = 0.35)在统计学上无显着差异。与对照组相比,研究组的两年增量DMFS评分存在显着差异(平均差异2.2; p <0.001)。调整混杂变量后,对照组和研究组之间DMFS增量的差异仍然很明显(平均值差异1.7; p <0.001)。结论:结果表明了预防方案的有效性。在相对较短的基础上(两年),在各个地点接受私人牙科治疗的患者群体中,疗效与年龄,性别,医疗问题,氟化物病史或以前的龋齿病史无关。 )。尽管令人鼓舞,但必须在更长的时间内跟踪这些结果,以便确定收益是否得以维持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号