首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of Botany >Generic relationships within and between the gymnosperm families Podocarpaceae and Phyllocladaceae based on an analysis of the chloroplast gene rbcL
【24h】

Generic relationships within and between the gymnosperm families Podocarpaceae and Phyllocladaceae based on an analysis of the chloroplast gene rbcL

机译:基于叶绿体基因rbcL分析的裸子植物科罗汉松科和裸子植物科之间的通用关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Analysis of sequences of the chloroplast gene rbcL for 76 taxa of Podocarpaceae (representing all genera except Parasitaxus) and five species of Phyllocladaceae were undertaken with respect to their relationships to each other and to 28 coniferalean outgroup taxa from seven families. The results indicate that Podocarpaceae are polyphyletic unless expanded to include Phyllocladaceae. Within Podocarpaceae, Sundacarpus is placed in a clade with Prumnopitys, and Falcatifolium is paraphyletic as a basal grade to Dacrydium. Phyllocladus is in an unresloved clade with Halocarpus, Manoao/Lagarostrobos and Prumnopitys/Sundacarpus. The separation of Afrocarpus from Podocarpus and its placement instead as sister to Nageia and Retrophyllum is supported. Podocarpus s. str. is monophyletic, with both subgenera identified, albeit poorly supported. The analysis placed Lepidothamnus and Saxegothaea in an unresolved basal polytomy within the family. There were no clear outgroup relationships with the family. These results differ from the morphological clades found by Kelch (1997), and disagree strongly with his 18S-sequence-based phylogeny (Kelch 1998). However, jackknife support values indicate that although the genera are well supported, relationships both within and between them are not, suggesting that intergeneric relationships in the family require further study. There is also some congruence between our results and those of the gymnosperm 18S study by Chaw et al. (1997), although their study included only three Podocarpaceae and one Phyllocladaceae species. [References: 69]
机译:分别对76个罗汉松科的类群(代表除寄生虫外的所有属)和5种毛竹科的叶绿体基因rbcL的序列进行了分析,分析了它们彼此之间的关系以及与7个科的28个针叶树外群类群的关系。结果表明,罗汉松科是多系的,除非扩展到包括毛竹科。在罗汉松科中,桑达卡普斯被放置在具有耐寒性的枝条中,而小叶紫叶菊属为菊科的基础等级。毛竹属(Phyllocladus)与Halocarpus,Manoao / Lagarostrobos和Prumnopitys / Sundacarpus处于无与伦比的状态。支持将罗汉果与罗汉松分开,并替代其作为纳吉亚和逆叶小sister的姐妹。罗汉松海峡是单系的,尽管支持不力,但都鉴定了两个亚属。该分析将鳞翅目和虎耳草科家族中尚未解决的基底多角体切开。与家人之间没有明确的外联关系。这些结果不同于Kelch(1997)发现的形态进化枝,并且与他基于18S序列的系统发育学(Kelch 1998)完全不同。然而,折刀的支持值表明,尽管该属得到了很好的支持,但它们之间以及它们之间的关系却不充分,这表明该家庭中的属际关系需要进一步研究。我们的研究结果与Chaw等人的裸子植物18S研究结果之间也存在一些一致性。 (1997年),尽管他们的研究仅包括3个罗汉松科和1个毛竹科。 [参考:69]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号