首页> 外文期刊>Sports health >Clinical Indoor Running Gait Analysis May Not Approximate Outdoor Running Gait Based on Novel Drone Technology
【24h】

Clinical Indoor Running Gait Analysis May Not Approximate Outdoor Running Gait Based on Novel Drone Technology

机译:基于新型无人机技术的临床室内跑步步态分析可能无法近似室外跑步步态

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Traditional running gait analysis is limited to artificial environments, but whether treadmill running approximates overground running is debated. This study aimed to compare treadmill gait analysis using fixed video with outdoor gait analysis using drone video capture.Hypothesis: Measured kinematics would be similar between natural outdoor running and traditional treadmill gait analysis. Study Design: Crossover study. Level of Evidence: Level 2.Methods: The study population included cross-country, track and field, and recreational athletes with current running mileage of at least 15 km per week. Participants completed segments in indoor and outdoor environments. Indoor running was completed on a treadmill with static video capture, and outdoor segments were obtained via drone on an outdoor track. Three reviewers independently performed clinical gait analysis on footage for 32 runners using kinematic measurements with published acceptable intra- and interrater reliability.Results: Of the 8 kinematic variables measured, 2 were found to have moderate agreement indoor versus outdoor, while 6 had fair to poor agreement. Foot strike at initial contact and rearfoot position at midstance had moderate agreement indoor versus outdoor, with a kappa of 0.54 and 0.49, respectively. The remaining variables: tibial inclination at initial contact, knee flexion angle initial contact, forward trunk lean full gait cycle, knee center position midstance, knee separation midstance, and lateral pelvic drop at midstance were found to have fair to poor agreement, ranging from 0.21 to 0.36.Conclusion: This study suggests that kinematics may differ between natural outdoor running and traditional treadmill gait analysis.Clinical Relevance: Providing recommendations for altering gait based on treadmill gait analysis may prove to be harmful if treadmill analysis does not approximate natural running environments. Drone technology could provide advancement in clinical running recommendations by capturing runners in natural environments.
机译:背景:传统的跑步步态分析仅限于人工环境,但跑步机跑步是否近似于地面跑步存在争议。本研究旨在比较使用固定视频的跑步机步态分析与使用无人机视频捕获的户外步态分析。假设:自然户外跑步和传统跑步机步态分析之间的测量运动学相似。研究设计:交叉研究。证据级别:2 级方法:研究人群包括目前每周跑步里程至少 15 公里的越野、田径和休闲运动员。参与者在室内和室外环境中完成了部分。室内跑步是在跑步机上完成的,并带有静态视频捕捉,室外部分是通过无人机在室外跑道上获得的。三名评价员使用运动学测量结果对 32 名跑步者的镜头独立进行了临床步态分析,并公布了可接受的评分者内和评分者间可靠性。结果:在测量的 8 个运动学变量中,发现 2 个在室内与室外具有中等一致性,而 6 个具有一般到较差的一致性。初次接触时的脚踩踏和中位时的后脚踩在室内与室外有中等一致性,kappa分别为0.54和0.49。其余变量:初始接触时的胫骨倾斜度、膝关节屈曲角初始接触、前躯干倾斜全步态周期、膝关节中心位置中间位置、膝关节分离中间位置和中间位置骨盆侧落差的一致性从0.21到0.36不等。临床相关性:如果跑步机分析不接近自然跑步环境,则基于跑步机步态分析提供改变步态的建议可能被证明是有害的。无人机技术可以通过在自然环境中捕捉跑步者来提供临床跑步建议的进步。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号