首页> 外文期刊>Audiology & neuro-otology >The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
【24h】

The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.

机译:各种持续时间的噪声暴露对大鼠听觉脑干反应,畸变产物耳声发射和瞬态诱发耳声发射的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study was designed to investigate the effect of various durations of noise exposure in animals on physiological responses from the cochlea which are also used clinically in humans: auditory brainstem response (ABR), transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). Rats were exposed to 113 dB SPL broad-band noise (12 h on/12 h off) for durations of 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 21 days, and tested 24 h after cessation of the noise and again after a period of 6 weeks. ABR threshold to click stimuli and to a 2-kHz tone burst (TB), TEOAE energy content and DPOAE amplitude in the exposed rats were compared to those in a group of control rats not exposed to noise. ABR thresholds (click and TB) were significantly elevated in all exposure duration groups compared to control rats. DPOAE amplitudes and TEOAE energy content were significantly reduced. The mean ABR thresholds following 21 days exposure were significantly greater (click = 100 dB pe SPL; TB = 115 dB pe SPL) than those following 3 days exposure (click = 86 dB pe SPL; TB = 91 dB pe SPL). Linear regression analysis between recorded responses and duration of noise exposure (days) showed a significant increase in ABR thresholds of approximately 0.8-- 1.4 dB/day. TEOAE and DPOAE responses showed no such dependence on noise duration and were already maximally reduced after only 3 days of exposure. This can be explained by the possibility that short noise exposures may cause damage to the early, more active stages of cochlear transduction (as shown by TEOAEs and DPOAEs). As the noise exposure continues, further damage may be induced at additional, later stages of the cochlear transduction cascade (as shown by ABR). Thus, ABR seems more sensitive to noise duration than OAE measures. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:这项研究旨在调查动物在各种噪声暴露时间下对耳蜗的生理反应的影响,耳蜗的生理反应也在临床上用于人类:听觉脑干反应(ABR),瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAE)和畸变产物耳声发射( DPOAE)。在3、6、9、12、15和21天的持续时间内,将大鼠暴露于113 dB SPL宽带噪声下(开12 h /关12 h),并在噪声停止后24 h和一段时间后再次测试6周。将暴露大鼠的点击刺激和2-kHz音调爆发(TB)的ABR阈值,TEOAE能量含量和DPOAE振幅与未暴露于噪声的对照组大鼠进行比较。与对照组相比,所有暴露持续时间组的ABR阈值(点击和TB)均显着升高。 DPOAE振幅和TEOAE能量含量显着降低。接触21天后的平均ABR阈值(点击= 100 dB pe SPL; TB = 115 dB pe SPL)要比接触3天后的平均ABR阈值(点击= 86 dB pe SPL; TB = 91 dB pe SPL)高。记录的响应与噪声暴露持续时间(天)之间的线性回归分析表明,ABR阈值显着增加了约0.8-- 1.4 dB /天。 TEOAE和DPOAE响应对噪声持续时间没有依赖性,仅在暴露3天后已最大程度降低。短时间暴露于噪声可能会损坏耳蜗转导的早期,更活跃的阶段(如TEOAE和DPOAE所示)的可能性可以解释。随着噪声暴露的继续,在耳蜗转导级联反应的其他后续阶段可能会引起进一步的损害(如ABR所示)。因此,ABR似乎比OAE措施对噪声持续时间更为敏感。版权所有2001 S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号