...
首页> 外文期刊>Attention, perception & psychophysics >Limits of generalization between categories and implications for theories of category specificity
【24h】

Limits of generalization between categories and implications for theories of category specificity

机译:类别之间的泛化限制及其对类别特异性理论的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Both domain-specific and expertise accounts of category specialization assume that generalization occurs within a domain but not between domains. Yet it is often difficult to define the boundaries and critical features of object domains. Differences in how categories are defined make it difficult to adjudicate between accounts of category specificity and may lead to contradictory results. For example, evidence for whether car experts recruit the fusiform face area is mixed, and this inconsistency may be due to the inclusion of antique cars in one of those previous studies (e.g., Grill-Spector, Knouf, & Kanwisher, 2004). The present study tested the generalization of expertise from modern to antique cars and found that modern-car experts showed expert discrimination and holistic processing of modern cars but not of antique cars. These findings suggest that the neural specialization underlying perceptual expertise is highly specific and may not generalize to distinct subclasses, even when they share some degree of perceptual and conceptual features.
机译:特定领域的专长帐户和类别专长的专业知识帐户都假定泛化发生在某个域内,但不在域之间。然而,通常很难定义对象域的边界和关键特征。类别定义方式的差异使得很难在类别特异性说明之间进行裁定,并可能导致矛盾的结果。例如,关于汽车专家是否招募梭形面部区域的证据是混合的,并且这种不一致可能是由于以前的一项研究中包括了古董车(例如,Grill-Spector,Knouf和&Kanwisher,2004)。本研究测试了从现代汽车到古董车的专业知识的普遍化,发现现代车专家显示出专家对现代车的歧视和整体处理,而对古董车则没有。这些发现表明,感知专长的神经专长是高度特定的,即使它们共享一定程度的感知和概念特征,也可能无法推广到不同的子类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号