首页> 外文期刊>Attention, perception & psychophysics >Spatial and visuospatial working memory tests predict performance in classic multiple-object tracking in young adults, but nonspatial measures of the executive do not
【24h】

Spatial and visuospatial working memory tests predict performance in classic multiple-object tracking in young adults, but nonspatial measures of the executive do not

机译:空间和视觉空间工作记忆测试可以预测年轻人中经典多对象跟踪的性能,但是执行者的非空间测量方法却不能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An individual-differences approach was used to investigate the roles of visuospatial working memory and the executive in multiple-object tracking. The Corsi Blocks and Visual Patterns Tests were used to assess visuospatial working memory. Two relatively nonspatial measures of the executive were used: operation span (OSPAN) and reading span (RSPAN). For purposes of comparison, the digit span test was also included (a measure not expected to correlate with tracking). The tests predicted substantial amounts of variance (R ~2=.33), and the visuospatial measures accounted for the majority (R ~2=.30), with each making a significant contribution. Although the executive measures correlated with each other, the RSPAN did not correlate with tracking. The correlation between OSPAN and tracking was similar in magnitude to that between digit span and tracking (p <.05 for both), and when regression was used to partial out shared variance between the two tests, the remaining variance predicted by the OSPAN was minimal (sr ~2=.029). When measures of spatial memory were included in the regression, the unique variance predicted by the OSPAN became negligible (sr ~2=.000004). This suggests that the executive, as measured by tests such as the OSPAN, plays little role in explaining individual differences in multiple-object tracking.
机译:个体差异方法用于研究视觉空间工作记忆和执行者在多目标跟踪中的作用。使用Corsi块和视觉模式测试来评估视觉空间工作记忆。执行者使用了两种相对非空间的度量:操作范围(OSPAN)和阅读范围(RSPAN)。为了进行比较,还包括了数字跨度测试(一种与跟踪无关的度量)。这些测试预测会有大量的方差(R〜2 = .33),而视觉空间测量值占大多数(R〜2 = .30),每一个都有很大的贡献。尽管执行措施相互关联,但RSPAN与跟踪无关。 OSPAN和跟踪之间的相关性在幅度上与数字跨度和跟踪之间的相关性相似(均为p <.05),并且当使用回归来部分地去除两次测试之间的共享方差时,由OSPAN预测的剩余方差很小(sr〜2 = .029)。当将空间记忆的度量包括在回归中时,由OSPAN预测的唯一方差可以忽略不计(sr〜2 = .000004)。这表明执行程序(通过OSPAN等测试来衡量)在解释多对象跟踪中的个体差异方面几乎没有作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号