首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Role of hydrological model structure in the assimilation of soil moisture for streamflow prediction
【24h】

Role of hydrological model structure in the assimilation of soil moisture for streamflow prediction

机译:水文模型结构在土壤水分同化中对径流预测的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Soil moisture data assimilation (SMDA) has found growing application in the hydrological research community because of readily available satellite-based soil moisture (SM) data. Several past studies have explored the capability to assimilate observed SM in hydrological model to enhance streamflow prediction. However, the impact of the conceptual hydrological model (CHM) structure on the SMDA in streamflow prediction has not been investigated yet. In this study, to understand the CHM structure's role, we used three different CHMs for the SMDA: dynamic Budyko (DB), Génie Rural à 4 paramètres Journalier (GR4J), and Probability Distributed Model (PDM) model. The SM obtained from Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) was assimilated using Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) for 43 Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX) basins. The GR4J model was found to be performed best from calibration and validation results, and the DB model was found to be performed least. The results show that the performance of the DB model improved during assimilation compared to its open-loop version for all the 43 basins. However, deterioration in model performance was observed for the GR4J and PDM model during assimilation for all basins except a few. The assimilated model performance was evaluated in respect of Assimilation Efficiency (AE) and ranged from 2.56 to 81.24, -70.9 to 17.65, and -71.38 to 24.86, respectively, for the DB, GR4J, and PDM model. Further, we hypothesized that if the GLDAS SM is better than the model-simulated SM, then improvement in the model performance is observed due to the SMDA. The coefficient of determination (r~2) between the SM simulated by all the three models without assimilation and the GLDAS SM was found for all the basins. Results indicated that the GR4J and PDM model captured SM better than the DB model. Moreover, to strengthen this hypothesis, we run the GR4J and PDM model deterministically, considering the daily GLDAS SM as the initial cond
机译:由于基于卫星的土壤湿度 (SM) 数据现成,土壤水分数据同化 (SMDA) 在水文研究界的应用越来越广泛。过去的几项研究探索了在水文模型中吸收观测到的SM的能力,以增强径流预测的能力。然而,概念水文模型(CHM)结构对SMDA在径流预测中的影响尚未得到研究。在这项研究中,为了理解 CHM 结构的作用,我们为 SMDA 使用了三种不同的 CHM:动态 Budyko (DB)、Génie Rural à 4 paramètres Journalier (GR4J) 和概率分布式模型 (PDM) 模型。利用集成卡尔曼滤波(EnKF)对全球陆地数据同化系统(GLDAS)获得的SM进行同化,用于43个模式参数估计实验(MOPEX)流域。从校准和验证结果来看,GR4J模型的性能最好,而DB模型的性能最低。结果表明,在43个流域中,DB模型在同化过程中的性能均优于开环模型。然而,除少数流域外,GR4J和PDM模式在同化过程中观察到模型性能下降。DB、GR4J和PDM模型的同化效率(AE)分别为2.56-81.24%、-70.9-17.65%和-71.38-24.86%。此外,我们假设,如果 GLDAS SM 优于模型模拟的 SM,则观察到模型性能的提高是由于 SMDA 而实现的。3个模型模拟的无同化SM与GLDAS SM的决定系数(r~2)均为所有盆地。结果表明,GR4J和PDM模型对SM的捕获效果优于DB模型。此外,为了加强这一假设,我们确定性地运行 GR4J 和 PDM 模型,将每日 GLDAS SM 视为初始 cond

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号