首页> 外文期刊>Brain: A journal of neurology >A systematic study of visual extinction. Between- and within-field deficits of attention in hemispatial neglect.
【24h】

A systematic study of visual extinction. Between- and within-field deficits of attention in hemispatial neglect.

机译:视觉消光的系统研究。在半pat侧忽视中场间和场内注意力不足。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mechanisms of visual extinction were investigated in four patients with right hemisphere damage using a partial report paradigm. Different shapes (star or triangle) were displayed in one, two or four possible locations so that double simultaneous stimuli occurred either across the two hemifields or within the same hemifield. Patients attended either to the location (right, left or both), number (one, two or four) or shape (no, one or two stars among the shapes presented) of stimuli in three separate experiments using the same displays and exposure duration. Reporting the location (Experiment 1) produced marked contralesional extinction, although reaction time was delayed compared with unilateral right trials, indicating unconscious processing. Reaction time was also delayed on correct bilateral and unilateral left trials. In contrast, enumerating stimuli (Experiment 2) caused no significant contralesional extinction on bilateral displays and reaction time was similar on bilateral and unilateral right trials, suggesting that information from both fields was grouped in a single numerable percept in this task. However, patients often detected only one of two stimuli within the left field. Whereas similarity of shapes improved localization and did not affect enumeration, identifying stars among shapes (Experiment 3) revealed a severe inability to detect two similar targets between hemifields as well as within each of the hemifields. Distracting triangles were generally less detrimental to the perception of a concurrent target on either side, but slowed the reaction time regardless of whether they were in the same or the opposite field. Relative difficulty in ignoring distractors correlated with neglect severity on a cancellation task, and was most prominent in one patient with a large amount of frontal damage. These findings suggest that (i) allocation of attention to identical stimuli can be modulated by task demand; (ii) enumerating a small set of items across fields may not require attending to individual stimuli but relies on preattentive subitizing ability, as found in normal subjects; (iii) location information may be critical for attentional mechanisms subserved by the parietal cortex and pathological competition for awareness in extinction; (iv) extinction entails a bilateral deficit in attending to two concurrent similar targets when their features must be identified; and (v) the relevance of the stimuli can modulate the distribution of attention, possibly through frontal top-down control. These findings are consistent with recent neurophysiological evidence of parietal and frontal attentional influences on ventral visual pathways.
机译:使用部分报告范例研究了四名右半球损伤患者的视觉消失机制。在一个,两个或四个可能的位置显示了不同的形状(星形或三角形),以便在两个半场或同一半场内同时发生双重刺激。在三个单独的实验中,患者使用相同的显示和曝光时间,分别对位置(右,左或两者),数量(一,二或四)或形状(所呈现的形状中没有,一或两颗星)进行了观察。报告该位置(实验1)产生了明显的对侧消光,尽管与单方面的右侧试验相比,反应时间有所延迟,表明潜意识加工。在正确的双边和单方面左试验中,反应时间也被延迟。相反,枚举刺激(实验2)在双侧显示器上没有引起明显的对侧消光,并且双侧和单侧右方试验的反应时间相似,这表明在该任务中,来自两个领域的信息被归类为一个单一的感知。但是,患者通常只在左视野中检测到两个刺激之一。尽管形状的相似性改善了定位并且不影响枚举,但是在形状之间识别恒星(实验3)表明,无法检测半场之间以及每个半场中的两个相似目标。分散注意力的三角形通常对双方都同时存在目标的感知不利,但是无论它们处于相同或相反的视野中,它们都会减慢反应时间。忽略牵张器的相对困难与取消任务时的疏忽严重程度有关,在一名额度较大的额叶损伤患者中最为突出。这些发现表明:(i)对相同刺激的注意分配可以通过任务需求来调节; (ii)枚举跨领域的一小部分项目可能不需要参加单个刺激,而是依赖于正常受试者中发现的细心的贴合能力; (iii)位置信息对于顶叶皮层所服务的注意力机制和对灭绝意识的病理竞争可能至关重要; (iv)灭绝意味着在必须确定两个同时存在的相似目标时,双边赤字; (v)刺激的相关性可能会通过正面自上而下的控制来调节注意力的分布。这些发现与最近的神经生理学证据有关顶叶和额叶注意对腹侧视觉通路的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号