...
首页> 外文期刊>World journal of urology. >Prioritization of risk situations in neuro-urology: guidelines from Association Francaise d'Urologie (AFU), Association Francophone Internationale des Groupes d'Animation de la Paraplegie (AFIGAP), Groupe de Neuro-urologie de Langue Francaise (GENULF), Societe Francaise de Medecine Physique et de Readaptation (SOFMER) and Societe Interdisciplinaire Francophone d'UroDynamique et de Pelvi-Perineologie (SIFUD-PP)
【24h】

Prioritization of risk situations in neuro-urology: guidelines from Association Francaise d'Urologie (AFU), Association Francophone Internationale des Groupes d'Animation de la Paraplegie (AFIGAP), Groupe de Neuro-urologie de Langue Francaise (GENULF), Societe Francaise de Medecine Physique et de Readaptation (SOFMER) and Societe Interdisciplinaire Francophone d'UroDynamique et de Pelvi-Perineologie (SIFUD-PP)

机译:Prioritization of risk situations in neuro-urology: guidelines from Association Francaise d'Urologie (AFU), Association Francophone Internationale des Groupes d'Animation de la Paraplegie (AFIGAP), Groupe de Neuro-urologie de Langue Francaise (GENULF), Societe Francaise de Medecine Physique et de Readaptation (SOFMER) and Societe Interdisciplinaire Francophone d'UroDynamique et de Pelvi-Perineologie (SIFUD-PP)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose The current health crisis has drastically impacted patient management in many fields, including neuro-urology, leading to a mandatory reorganization. The aim of this work was to establish guidelines regarding the prioritization and optimal timing of each step of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction management. Methods A steering committee included urologists and physical medicine and rehabilitation practitioners. Based on a literature review and their own expertise, they established a comprehensive risk-situation list and built a risk scale, allowing multiple other experts to score each clinical situation. New recommendations were generated using a Delphi process approach. Results Forty-nine experts participated in the rating group. Among the 206 initial items, 163 were selected and divided into four domains, diagnosis and assessment, treatment, follow-up, and complications, and two sub-domains, general (applicable for all neurological conditions) and condition-specific [varying according to the neurological condition (spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, brain injury, Parkinsonism, dysraphism, lower motor neuron lesions)]. The resulted guidelines are expert opinions established by a panel of French-speaking specialists, which could limit the scalability of this work. Conclusions The present multidisciplinary collaborative work generates recommendations which complement existing guidelines and help clinicians to reorganize their patients' list in the long term with a personalized medicine approach, in the context of health crisis or not.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号