...
首页> 外文期刊>Current diabetes reviews >Is it Worth CANVASing for CREDENCE? A Benefit-risk Analysis
【24h】

Is it Worth CANVASing for CREDENCE? A Benefit-risk Analysis

机译:值得为 CREDENCE 画布吗?收益-风险分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background and Aims: A number of significant positive and negative signals emerged from the CANVAS Program and CREDENCE trial with the use of canagliflozin. These signals are confusing. A Likelihood of being Helped of Harmed (LHH) analysis was conducted to determine the risk, benefit ratio associated with canagliflozin use and address the signals as a continuum.
机译:背景和目标:使用卡格列净的 CANVAS 计划和 CREDENCE 试验出现了许多重要的积极和消极信号。这些信号令人困惑。进行了受伤害帮助的可能性 (LHH) 分析,以确定与使用卡格列净相关的风险、获益率,并将信号作为一个连续体进行处理。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号