首页> 外文期刊>Virtual reality >A use case study comparing augmented reality (AR) and electronic document-based maintenance instructions considering tasks complexity and operator competency level
【24h】

A use case study comparing augmented reality (AR) and electronic document-based maintenance instructions considering tasks complexity and operator competency level

机译:比较增强现实 (AR) 和基于文档的电子维护说明的用例研究,考虑任务复杂性和操作员能力水平

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Augmented reality (AR) is more and more used in the industrial context for maintenance, assembly operation. However, owing to the evolution and maturity of the technology, it is still necessary to evaluate the usage and benefits of AR in an industrial context to go further than proof of concept. As such, this paper proposes an analysis of AR case study in the literature. Then, this paper presents a methodology for comparing AR and electronic document-based complex maintenance instructions considering tasks complexity and operator competency level. The main results show that the consultation duration of the AR tablet is 34 statistically faster than the PDF tablet. It also shows that error concerning similar objects is reduced thanks to AR. Moreover, the study specifically focuses on types of task that worth using AR. However, the study shows that usability of the AR device is less well rated than the PDF for "beginner-intermediate" operators. Finally, an in-depth analysis permits extracting recommendations of the different factors to take into account with industrial AR applications.
机译:增强现实 (AR) 越来越多地用于工业环境中的维护、装配操作。然而,由于技术的发展和成熟,仍然有必要评估AR在工业环境中的使用和好处,以超越概念验证。因此,本文对文献中的AR案例研究进行了分析。然后,本文提出了一种比较AR和基于电子文档的复杂维护指令的方法,考虑了任务的复杂性和操作员的能力水平。主要结果显示,AR平板的咨询时长在统计学上比PDF平板快34%。它还表明,由于AR,有关相似物体的误差减少了。此外,该研究特别关注值得使用 AR 的任务类型。然而,研究表明,对于“初级-中级”操作员来说,AR设备的可用性不如PDF好。最后,通过深入分析,可以提取出不同因素的建议,以考虑工业AR应用。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号