首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A biomechanical cadaveric study of a rectangular quadriceps and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft configuration versus a round hamstring graft
【24h】

Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A biomechanical cadaveric study of a rectangular quadriceps and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft configuration versus a round hamstring graft

机译:单束前交叉韧带重建:矩形股四头肌和bone骨腱-骨移植物结构与圆形绳肌移植物的生物力学尸体研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose The purposes of this study were to investigate anterior tibial translation under loading conditions after single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a rectangular tunnel placement strategy with quadriceps and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft and to compare these data with a SB hamstring reconstruction with a round tunnel design. Methods In 9 human cadaveric knees, the knee kinematics were examined with robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing. Within the same specimen, the knee kinematics under simulated pivot-shift and KT-1000 arthrometer (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) testing were determined at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 90 of flexion under different conditions: intact knee, ACL-deficient knee, and SB ACL-reconstructed knee. For the SB ACL-reconstructed knee, 3 different SB reconstruction techniques were used: a rectangular tunnel strategy (9 × 5 mm) with quadriceps graft, a rectangular tunnel strategy with BPTB graft, and a round tunnel strategy (7 mm) with hamstring graft. Results In a simulated Lachman test, a statistically significant difference was found at 0 and 15 of knee flexion between the rectangular reconstruction with quadriceps graft (5.1 ± 1.2 mm and 8.3 ± 2 mm, respectively) or BPTB graft (5.3 ± 1.5 mm and 8 ± 1.9 mm, respectively) and the reconstruction using hamstring graft (7.2 ± 1.4 mm and 12 ± 1.8 mm, respectively) (P =.032 and P =.033, respectively, at 0; P =.023 and P =.02, respectively, at 15). On the simulated pivot-shift test at 0 and 15, rectangular ACL reconstruction with quadriceps graft (3.9 ± 2.1 mm and 6.5 ± 1.7 mm, respectively) or BPTB graft (4.2 ± 1.8 mm and 6.7 ± 1.7 mm, respectively) showed a significantly lower anterior tibial translation when compared with round tunnel reconstruction (5.5 ± 2.1 mm and 7.9 ± 1.9 mm, respectively) (P =.03 and P =.041, respectively, at 0; P =.042 and P =.046, respectively, at 15). Conclusions Under simulated Lachman testing and pivot-shift testing, a reconstruction technique using a rectangular tunnel results in significantly lower anterior tibial translation at 0 and 15 of flexion in comparison to knees reconstructed with a hamstring SB graft using a round tunnel strategy. Clinical Relevance ACL reconstruction with a rectangular tunnel and BPTB and quadriceps tendon might result in better anterior knee stability at low flexion angles than ACL reconstruction with hamstring SB graft and a round tunnel in the clinical setting.
机译:目的本研究的目的是研究采用四头肌和bone骨肌腱-骨(BPTB)移植的矩形隧道放置策略在单束(SB)前交叉韧带(ACL)重建后在负荷条件下的胫骨前移,以及将这些数据与采用圆形隧道设计的SB ham绳肌重建进行比较。方法在9个人体尸体膝盖中,通过机器人/通用力矩传感器测试来检查膝盖的运动学。在同一标本中,在不同条件下(完整的膝盖,ACL)在0、15、30、60和90屈曲度下,在模拟的枢轴位移和KT-1000关节运动计(MEDmetric,圣地亚哥,加利福尼亚)测试下确定膝盖的运动学。膝关节受损,以及SB ACL重建的膝关节。对于SB ACL重建的膝盖,使用了3种不同的SB重建技术:股四头肌移植的矩形隧道策略(9×5 mm),BPTB移植的矩形隧道策略以及腿筋移植的圆形隧道策略(7 mm) 。结果在模拟的Lachman测试中,在以股四头肌移植(分别为5.1±1.2 mm和8.3±2 mm)或BPTB移植(分别为5.3±1.5 mm和8)的矩形重建术中,在膝盖屈曲0和15处发现了统计学上的显着差异。 ±1.9毫米)和)绳肌移植重建术(分别为7.2±1.4毫米和12±1.8毫米)(在0时分别为P = .032和P = .033; P = .023和P = .02分别在15)。在0和15的模拟枢轴位移测试中,四头肌移植(分别为3.9±2.1 mm和6.5±1.7 mm)或BPTB移植(分别为4.2±1.8 mm和6.7±1.7 mm)的矩形ACL重建表现出显着性与圆形隧道重建相比,胫骨前平移低(分别为5.5±2.1 mm和7.9±1.9 mm)(分别为0时P = .03和P = .041; P = .042和P = .046) ,在15)。结论在模拟的Lachman测试和枢轴移位测试下,与使用圆形隧道策略的绳SB移植重建的膝盖相比,使用矩形隧道的重建技术在屈曲0和15时胫骨前移明显降低。临床相关性在临床环境中,使用矩形隧道,BPTB和股四头肌腱的ACL重建术可能比使用绳SB移植和圆形隧道术的ACL重建术在低屈曲角度下可获得更好的前膝关节稳定性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号