...
【24h】

Arthroscopic bankart repair using knot-tying versus knotless suture anchors: Is there a difference?

机译:使用结扎术与无结缝合锚钉进行关节镜bankart修复:有区别吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose To compare the clinical outcome between the use of knotless sutures versus knot-tying sutures in arthroscopic Bankart repairs. Methods Between January 2007 and January 2011, 87 patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with the use of knot-tying suture anchors or knotless suture anchors were evaluated, with 45 patients in the knot-tying suture group and 42 patients in the knotless group. Patients were assigned to either group, with odd-numbered patients going to the knot-tying suture arm and even-numbered patients assigned to the knotless arm. Outcomes included the Constant score, the visual analog scale (VAS) score, patient satisfaction score, and range of motion in forward flexion and external rotation with the arm in adduction. Redislocations or subluxations with the 2 techniques was also studied. Results Both groups showed a statistically significant improvement between the preoperative and postoperative VAS scores and Constant scores. In the knot-tying suture group, the VAS score improved from 2.5 ± 2.3 to 0.7 ± 0.5 (P <.05) and the Constant score improved from 64 ± 7 to 92 ± 10 (P <.05). In the knotless group, the VAS score improved from 2.8 ± 2.5 to 0.9 ± 0.6 (P <.05), and the Constant score improved from 62 ± 6 to 89 ± 9 (P <.05). The patient satisfaction scores were 6.9 and 7.1 for the knot tying and knotless groups, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing the outcomes between the 2 groups. The change in the range of forward flexion and external rotation was also similar in the 2 groups. There was also no difference in recurrence or redislocation rates. Conclusions Both the knot-tying and knotless suture anchors groups showed statistically significant and similar improvement in VAS and Constant scores. Both anchors provided reasonable outcomes. The knotless suture anchor is a good alternative to knot-tying suture anchors so that arthroscopic Bankart repairs can be performed without knot tying. Level of Evidence Level II, prospective comparative study.
机译:目的比较在关节镜行Bankart修复中使用无结缝合与结结缝合之间的临床结果。方法2007年1月至2011年1月,对87例行结扎缝合锚钉或无结缝合锚钉进行关节镜行Bankart修复的患者进行了评估,结扎缝合组45例,无结缝合组42例。将患者分为两组,奇数患者进入打结缝合线组,偶数患者进入无结线组。结果包括恒定评分,视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,患者满意度评分,以及前臂屈曲和外旋时内收臂的活动范围。还研究了两种技术的重定位或半脱位。结果两组均在术前和术后VAS评分和Constant评分之间具有统计学上的显着改善。在打结缝合线组中,VAS评分从2.5±2.3改善至0.7±0.5(P <.05),恒定评分从64±7改善至92±10(P <.05)。在无结组中,VAS评分从2.8±2.5改善至0.9±0.6(P <.05),恒定评分从62±6改善至89±9(P <.05)。打结组和无打结组的患者满意度分别为6.9和7.1。比较两组之间的结果时,没有发现统计学上的显着差异。两组的前屈和外旋范围的变化也相似。复发或再分配率也没有差异。结论结扎和无结缝合锚组均显示出统计学上显着且相似的VAS和Constant评分改善。两位主播均提供了合理的结果。无结缝线锚固器是打结缝合线锚固器的良好替代方案,因此关节镜检查Bankart修复无需打结即可。证据等级II级,前瞻性比较研究。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号