...
【24h】

Triple-loaded single-anchor stitch configurations: an analysis of cyclically loaded suture-tendon interface security.

机译:三重加载的单锚针迹配置:循环加载的缝线-腱接口安全性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the strength and suture-tendon interface security of different suture configurations from triple-suture-loaded anchors. METHODS: A juvenile bovine infraspinatus tendon was detached and repaired by use of 4 different suture combinations from 2 suture anchors: 3 simple sutures in each anchor (ThreeVo anchor; Linvatec, Largo, FL); 2 peripheral simple stitches and 1 central horizontal mattress suture passed deeper into the tendon, creating a larger footprint (bigfoot-print anchor); 2 peripheral simple stitches with 1 central horizontal mattress stitch passed through the same holes as the simple sutures (stitch-of-Burns); and 2 simple stitches (TwoVo anchor; Linvatec). The constructs were cyclically loaded between 10 N and 180 N for 3,500 cycles and then destructively tested. The number of cycles required to create a 5-mm gap and a 10-mm gap and the ultimate load to failure and failure mode were recorded. RESULTS: The ThreeVo anchor was strongest and most resistant to cyclic loading (P < .01). The TwoVo anchor was least resistant to cyclic loading. The stitch-of-Burns anchor was more resistant to cyclic loading than both the bigfoot-print anchor and the TwoVo anchor (P < .03). The ThreeVo, stitch-of-Burns, and TwoVo anchors were stronger than the bigfoot-print anchor (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Three simple sutures in an anchor hold better than two simple sutures. Three simple sutures provide superior suture-tendon security than combinations of one mattress and two simple stitches subjected to cyclic loading. A central mattress stitch placed more medially than two peripheral simple stitches (bigfoot-print anchor) configured to enlarge the tendon-suture footprint was not as resistant to cyclic loading or destructive testing as three simple stitches (ThreeVo anchor). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Placing a central mattress stitch more medially than 2 peripheral simple stitches to enlarge the tendon-suture footprint was not as resistant to cyclic loading or destructive testing as 3 simple stitches.
机译:目的:本研究评估了三重缝合锚钉在不同缝合结构中的强度和缝合肌腱界面安全性。方法:使用来自2个缝合锚的4种不同缝合线组合,分离并修复了幼年牛腓骨肌腱:每个锚中有3个简单缝合线(ThreeVo锚; Linvatec,Largo,FL);和3个简单缝合。 2条外围简单针迹和1条中央水平褥式缝合线更深地进入肌腱,形成较大的足迹(大脚印锚); 2个外围简单针迹和1个中央水平床垫针迹穿过与简单缝合线相同的孔(Burns-Burns);和2个简单针迹(TwoVo锚; Linvatec)。将构建体循环加载在10 N和180 N之间3,500个循环,然后进行破坏性测试。记录产生5mm的间隙和10mm的间隙所需的循环次数以及最终的破坏载荷和破坏模式。结果:ThreeVo锚最强,对循环载荷的抵抗力最大(P <.01)。 TwoVo锚对循环载荷的抵抗力最低。与大脚印锚和TwoVo锚相比,Burn-of-Burns锚对循环载荷的抵抗力更高(P <.03)。 ThreeVo,Burn-of-Burns和TwoVo锚点比大脚印锚点强(P <.05)。结论:锚固中的三个简单缝合线比两个简单缝合线具有更好的固定性。与承受周期性载荷的一个床垫和两个简单​​针迹的组合相比,三种简单的缝合线可提供卓越的缝合肌腱安全性。一个中央床垫针脚比两个外围简单针脚(大脚印锚)的中间位置要大,该两个简单针脚被配置为扩大腱缝合线的覆盖范围,其抗周期性载荷或破坏性测试的能力不如三个简单针脚(ThreeVo锚钉)。临床意义:将中央床垫针脚比2个外围简单针脚更靠中间放置以扩大肌腱缝合线的覆盖范围,不如3个简单针脚那样耐循环载荷或破坏性测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号