...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Readability of arthroscopy-related patient education materials from the american academy of orthopaedic surgeons and arthroscopy association of North America Web sites
【24h】

Readability of arthroscopy-related patient education materials from the american academy of orthopaedic surgeons and arthroscopy association of North America Web sites

机译:美国矫形外科医师学会和北美关节镜协会网站上与关节镜相关的患者教育材料的可读性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We sought to assess the readability levels of arthroscopy-related patient education materials available on the Web sites of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and the Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA). We identified all articles related to arthroscopy available in 2012 from the online patient education libraries of AAOS and AANA. After performing follow-up editing, we assessed each article with the Flesch-Kincaid (FK) readability test. Mean readability levels of the articles from the AAOS Web site and the AANA Web site were compared. We also determined the number of articles with readability levels at or below the eighth-grade level (the average reading ability of the US adult population) and sixth-grade level (the widely recommended level for patient education materials). Intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability of FK grade assessment were evaluated. A total of 62 articles were reviewed (43 from AAOS and 19 from AANA). The mean overall FK grade level was 10.2 (range, 5.2 to 12). The AAOS articles had a mean FK grade level of 9.6 (range, 5.2 to 12), whereas the AANA articles had a mean FK grade level of 11.4 (range, 8.7 to 12); the difference was significant (P <.0001). Only 3 articles had a readability level at or below the eighth-grade level and only 1 was at or below the sixth-grade level; all were from AAOS. Intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient of 1 for both). Online patient education materials related to arthroscopy from AAOS and AANA may be written at a level too difficult for a large portion of the patient population to comprehend.
机译:我们试图评估美国骨科医师学会(AAOS)和北美关节镜协会(AANA)网站上与关节镜相关的患者教育材料的可读性。我们确定了2012年从AAOS和AANA的在线患者教育库中可获得的所有与关节镜检查相关的文章。进行后续编辑后,我们使用Flesch-Kincaid(FK)可读性测试评估了每篇文章。比较了AAOS网站和AANA网站上文章的平均可读性。我们还确定了可读性水平达到或低于八年级水平(美国成年人口的平均阅读能力)和六年级水平(广泛推荐用于患者教育材料的水平)的文章数。评估了FK等级评估员的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。共审查了62篇文章(AAOS中的43篇文章和AANA中的19篇文章)。 FK总平均成绩为10.2(范围为5.2至12)。 AAOS文章的平均FK等级为9.6(范围为5.2至12),而AANA文章的平均FK等级为11.4(范围为8.7至12);差异显着(P <.0001)。只有3篇文章的可读性级别达到或低于八年级,只有一篇文章的可读性达到或低于六年级;全部来自AAOS。观察者内的可靠性和观察者间的可靠性极佳(两者的类内相关系数均为1)。来自AAOS和AANA的与关节镜检查有关的在线患者教育材料的撰写水平可能难以使大部分患者理解。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号