...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthritis care & research >Comparison of Radiographic Joint Space Width With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cartilage Morphometry: Analysis of Longitudinal Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative
【24h】

Comparison of Radiographic Joint Space Width With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cartilage Morphometry: Analysis of Longitudinal Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative

机译:放射线照相关节间隙宽度与磁共振成像软骨形态测量的比较:骨关节炎倡议的纵向数据分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiography are established imaging modalities for the assessment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The objective of our study was to compare the responsiveness of radiographic joint space width (JSW) with MRI-derived measures of cartilage morphometry for OA progression in participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI).Methods. This study examined the baseline and 12-month visits of a subset of 150 subjects from the OAI. Measurement of radiographic JSW was facilitated by the use of automated software that delineated the femoral and tibial margins of the joint. Measures of medial compartment minimum JSW and JSW at fixed locations were compared with cartilage morphometry measures derived from MRI. The results were stratified by Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) scale grade and by tibiofemoral anatomic axis angle. In order to examine the relative responsiveness of various techniques, we calculated the standardized response mean (SRM) between the 2 visits.Results. The SRM for radiographic JSW measured at the optimal location was -0.32 compared with -0.39 for the most responsive MRI measure. For the subgroup with a K/L scale grade of 2 or 3, the most responsive SRM values were -0.34 for radiographic JSW and -0.42 for MRI.Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that new measures using a software analysis of digital knee radiographic images are comparable with MRI in detecting OA progression, and potentially superior when considering the cost-effectiveness of the 2 imaging modalities.
机译:目的。磁共振成像(MRI)和放射线照相术已建立用于评估膝骨关节炎(OA)的成像方式。我们研究的目的是比较骨关节炎倡议组织(OAI)参与者的放射摄影关节间隙宽度(JSW)与MRI衍生的软骨形态测量指标对OA进展的反应性。这项研究检查了来自OAI的150名受试者的基线和12个月的随访。通过使用描绘关节的股骨和胫骨边缘的自动化软件,可以方便地测量放射线JSW。将固定位置内侧隔室最小JSW和JSW的测量值与MRI得出的软骨形态测量值进行比较。结果按Kellgren / Lawrence(K / L)标度等级和胫股解剖轴角度进行分层。为了检查各种技术的相对响应度,我们计算了两次就诊之间的标准化响应均值(SRM)。在最佳位置测得的射线照相JSW的SRM为-0.32,而对MRI最敏感的测量为-0.39。对于K / L评分等级为2或3的亚组,放射线JSW的最敏感SRM值为-0.34,MRI的SRM值为-0.42。我们的研究表明,使用数字膝关节X线照片软件分析的新措施在检测OA进展方面与MRI相当,并且在考虑这两种成像方式的成本效益时可能具有更好的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号