首页> 外文期刊>Arthritis care & research >Fibromyalgia: do not give up the tender point count too easily: comment on the article by Wolfe et al.
【24h】

Fibromyalgia: do not give up the tender point count too easily: comment on the article by Wolfe et al.

机译:纤维肌痛:不要轻易放弃招标点数:对Wolfe等人的文章发表评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We read with interest the article by Wolfe et al (1) and the editorial by Wolfe (2), published recently in Arthritis Care & Research, introducing new diagnostic criteria for the fibromyalgia syndrome. These preliminary diagnostic criteria (including a widespread pain index [WPI] >=7 and a symptom severity [SS] scale score of >=5, or a WPI of 3-6 and an SS scale score of >=9) raise important concerns. First, the new criteria are intended to get rid of the tender point examination introduced in 1990 by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) (3). Abandoning an intrinsic requirement for physical examination in favor of indices and scales carries the risk of discarding the "laying on of hands" and a careful clinical examination altogether. Indeed, the physician who regards the tender point examination as cumbersome may think the same of a thorough rheumatologic and neurologic examination and limit the clinical encounter to a structured interview. Yet, multifocal pain has a broad differential diagnosis, relying on careful history taking and clinical examination.
机译:我们感兴趣地阅读了Wolfe等人(1)的文章和Wolfe(2)的社论,该文章最近发表在Arthritis Care&Research上,介绍了纤维肌痛综合征的新诊断标准。这些初步的诊断标准(包括广泛的疼痛指数[WPI]> = 7,症状严重程度[SS]量表评分> = 5,或WPI为3-6,SS量表评分> = 9)引起了重要的关注。首先,新标准旨在摆脱1990年美国风湿病学会(ACR)引入的压痛点检查(3)。放弃对身体检查的内在要求而改用指数和量表,将有丢弃“手掌”和进行仔细临床检查的风险。实际上,认为压痛点检查很麻烦的医生可能会认为它与彻底的风湿病和神经病学检查一样,并且将临床诊治限于结构化面试。然而,多灶性疼痛依靠仔细的病史记录和临床检查可以进行广泛的鉴别诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号