首页> 外文期刊>Arthritis and Rheumatism >A higher degree of criticism about the effectiveness of bosentan for digital ulcers in scleroderma patients, as for interstitial disease, is also necessary: Comment on the article by Seibold et al
【24h】

A higher degree of criticism about the effectiveness of bosentan for digital ulcers in scleroderma patients, as for interstitial disease, is also necessary: Comment on the article by Seibold et al

机译:还需要对波生坦对硬皮病患者的数字溃疡以及间质疾病的有效性提出更高的批评:对Seibold等人文章的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To the Editor:In a recent article, Seibold et al report a randomized controlled trial (RCT) showing negative results of the use of bosentan in systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related pulmonary fibrosis (1). However, 2 double-blind RCTs (the Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study on the Prevention of Ischemic Digital Ulcers in Scleroderma [RAPIDS-1 and RAPIDS-2]) with similar designs conducted by the same group of authors (2,3) demonstrated the efficacy of bosentan for the prevention of digital ulcers in SSc patients. Since then, bosentan has been considered a useful therapy and even a new hope for the prevention of digital ulcers, and is approved for this indication in Europe (4).
机译:在最近的一篇文章中,Seibold等人报告了一项随机对照试验(RCT),显示在系统性硬化症(SSc)相关的肺纤维化中使用波生坦的阴性结果(1)。但是,由同一组作者进行的2项双盲RCT(随机安慰剂对照研究,用于预防硬皮病缺血性数字溃疡[RAPIDS-1和RAPIDS-2])(2,3)表明,波生坦预防SSc患者数字溃疡的功效。从那时起,波生坦被认为是预防数字溃疡的一种有用疗法,甚至是新的希望,并且在欧洲已被批准用于这种适应症(4)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号