首页> 外文期刊>Asian Journal of Animal Sciences >Biomechanical Comparison of Plate-Nail Vs. Plate-Rod for Experimentally-Induced Gap Fractures in ex vivo Canine Femora
【24h】

Biomechanical Comparison of Plate-Nail Vs. Plate-Rod for Experimentally-Induced Gap Fractures in ex vivo Canine Femora

机译:板钉VS的生物力学比较。板棒用于离体犬股骨的实验性间隙骨折

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose this original article is to compare the mechanical properties of an interlocking nail-plate combination (plate-nail) vs. an intramedullary pin-plate combination (plate-rod) applied to experimentally induced gap fractures in canine femora.Twenty four paired canine femora were assigned to either plate-nail or plate-rod with 2.7 mm or 3.5 mm system constructs. In each femur, a mid-diaphyseal ostectomy was performed and the selected system was applied. Paired system constructs were subjectedto compression and bending tests. The maximum load differed significantly between fixation systems. The plate-nail system had greater maximum load than plate-rod system. The strength, stiffness and maximum deformation was similar between plate-rod and plate-nail. The plate-nail system proved to be a good option for diaphyseal long bone fracture fixation in dogs.
机译:这篇原始文章的目的是比较联锁的钉-板组合(板-钉)与髓内钉-板-组合(板-杆)在犬股骨上实验性诱发的缝隙性骨折的力学性能。二十四对犬股骨被分配到具有2.7mm或3.5mm系统构造的板钉或板棒中。在每个股骨中,进行中干phy端骨切除术并应用所选的系统。配对的系统构造进行了压缩和弯曲测试。固定系统之间的最大负载差异很大。板钉系统比板钉系统具有更大的最大载荷。板杆和板钉之间的强度,刚度和最大变形相似。板钉系统被证明是犬骨干骨干骨折固定的好选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号