...
首页> 外文期刊>ASDC journal of dentistry for children >Shear strength of sealants placed with non-rinse conditioning compared to a conventional acid etch-rinse technique.
【24h】

Shear strength of sealants placed with non-rinse conditioning compared to a conventional acid etch-rinse technique.

机译:与传统的酸蚀-冲洗技术相比,采用非冲洗处理的密封胶的剪切强度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The present study compared the shearing strength of a non-rinse conditioning (NRC) compomer sealant to that of a conventional sealant. Thirty molars and premolars were sectioned longitudinally. The resulting halves were divided into 4 groups. Cylinders of sealants were bonded to the sections using a gelatin capsule as a matrix, as follows: Group A (n = 15) NRC + Prime & Bond + Dyract Seal; Group B (n = 15) same as group A but with phosphoric acid and rinse; Group C (n = 15) conventional phosphoric acid + Helioseal; Group D (n = 15) NRC + Helioseal. After immersing the specimens in water for 7 days, the samples were mounted on the Instron testing machine at a 20 mm/min crosshead speed. The results were subjected to ANOVA with Scheffe test, with a significant level of .05. No shearing strength values could be obtained for the specimens of group D. Some cylinders separated from the enamel while still immersed in the water, and in others the adhesion was too low, and no readings could be observed. For all groups, failure occurred at the sealant-enamel interface. The mean value for group A was 5.33 MPa, significantly less than that of groups B 9.12 MPa and C 9.63 MPa (p < 0.006). No significant difference of the mean shear strength was evident between groups B and C. No rinse conditioning with Dyract Seal led to a considerably lower bond strength value than Dyract Seal and Helioseal with phosphoric acid and rinsing.
机译:本研究比较了非冲洗调理(NRC)复合材料密封胶与传统密封胶的剪切强度。纵向切开三十颗磨牙和前磨牙。将所得的两半分为4组。使用明胶胶囊作为基质将密封剂的圆柱体粘结到切片上,如下所示:A组(n = 15)NRC +灌注和粘结+ Dyract密封; B组(n = 15)与A组相同,但用磷酸冲洗。 C组(n = 15)常规磷酸+ Heiloseal; D组(n = 15)NRC + Heiloseal。将样品浸入水中7天后,将样品以20 mm / min的十字头速度安装在Instron测试机上。结果经过Scheffe检验进行ANOVA,显着水平为0.05。 D组的样品无法获得剪切强度值。一些圆柱体与瓷釉分离,但仍浸入水中,而另一些圆柱体的粘合力太低,无法观察到读数。对于所有组,密封胶和瓷釉界面均发生破坏。 A组的平均值为5.33 MPa,显着低于B组的9.12 MPa和C组的9.63 MPa(p <0.006)。 B组和C组之间的平均剪切强度没有显着差异。使用Dyract Seal进行漂洗不会导致粘结强度值明显低于使用磷酸和漂洗的Dyract Seal和Heiloseal。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号