...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. >Static progressive versus dynamic splinting for posttraumatic elbow stiffness: a systematic review of 232 patients.
【24h】

Static progressive versus dynamic splinting for posttraumatic elbow stiffness: a systematic review of 232 patients.

机译:静态渐进与动态夹板治疗创伤后肘部僵硬:232例患者的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Both dynamic orthoses and static progressive splinting show good results for the treatment of elbow stiffness, regardless of etiology. The choice for one treatment over the other is based on the preference of the surgeon and patient. We recommend to continue nonoperative treatment with dynamic or static bracing for 12 months or until patients stop making progression in range of elbow motion.
机译:无论是何种病因,动态矫形器和静态渐进夹板均显示出良好的效果,可治疗肘部僵硬。一种选择哪种治疗方法是基于外科医生和患者的偏好。我们建议继续使用动态或静态支撑进行非手术治疗12个月,或者直到患者停止在肘部运动范围内进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号