首页> 外文期刊>Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. >Radiofrequency, high-frequency, and electrocautery treatments vs partial inferior turbinotomy: microscopic and macroscopic effects on nasal mucosa.
【24h】

Radiofrequency, high-frequency, and electrocautery treatments vs partial inferior turbinotomy: microscopic and macroscopic effects on nasal mucosa.

机译:射频,高频和电灼治疗与部分下鼻甲切开术:对鼻粘膜的微观和宏观影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the microscopic and macroscopic effects of radiofrequency, high-frequency, and electrocautery therapies with partial inferior turbinotomy in the treatment of nasal obstruction caused by inferior turbinate hypertrophy. DESIGN: Nonrandomized controlled trial. SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Genoa. PATIENTS: The study included 80 patients affected by nasal obstruction from hypertrophied inferior turbinates. INTERVENTIONS: Homogeneous patient groups A, B, C, and D underwent radiofrequency, high-frequency, and electrocautery treatments and partial inferior turbinotomy, respectively, to surgically reduce hypertrophied inferior turbinates. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Prior to surgery and at 7-day and 2-month follow-up evaluations, patients' outcomes were assessed via visual analogue scale, nasal endoscopy, nasal monofilament test, nasal mucociliary transport time (NMTT), anterior active rhinomanometry, and histologic examination of microbiopsy specimens from the inferior turbinate mucosa. RESULTS: Compared with groups A, B, and C 2 months after surgery, group D showed a lower subjective assessment of symptoms score, normal NMTT (vs an increase in all other groups), lower stimulus to trigger a touch response at monofilament test (vs hyposensitivity in the other groups), and absence of histologic changes. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, no one has previously performed comparative studies to conclusively demonstrate which surgical technique is ideal. Our results show that the partial inferior nasal turbinotomy is the best method of treatment because it most effectively maintains satisfactory nasal physiologic integrity without damaging nasal mucosa or underlying nerves.
机译:目的:比较射频,高频和电灼疗法与部分下鼻甲切开术治疗下鼻甲肥大引起的鼻阻塞的微观和宏观效果。设计:非随机对照试验。单位:热那亚大学耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科。患者:该研究包括80例肥厚的下鼻甲鼻塞患者。干预措施:均质的A,B,C和D组患者分别接受了射频,高频和电灼治疗以及部分下鼻甲切开术,以手术方式减少肥大的下鼻甲。主要观察指标:在手术前以及在7天和2个月的随访评估中,通过视觉模拟量表,鼻内窥镜检查,鼻单丝试验,鼻粘膜纤毛运输时间(NMTT),前路主动鼻测压,和下鼻甲粘膜活检标本的组织学检查。结果:与术后2个月的A,B和C组相比,D组的主观评估症状评分较低,NMTT正常(相对于其他所有组均升高),单丝测试触发触觉反应的刺激较低(相对于其他组的敏感性不足),并且没有组织学改变。结论:据我们所知,没有人以前进行过比较研究来最终证明哪种手术技术是理想的。我们的结果表明,部分鼻下鼻甲切开术是最好的治疗方法,因为它可以最有效地保持令人满意的鼻腔生理完整性,而不会损坏鼻粘膜或下层神经。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号