首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England >On-site cytotechnician evaluation of the adequacy of fine needle aspiration in a neck lump clinic
【24h】

On-site cytotechnician evaluation of the adequacy of fine needle aspiration in a neck lump clinic

机译:颈部肿块诊所中细针抽吸的现场细胞技术人员评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION The gold standard for assessing neck lumps is a one;stop clinic with an on;site cytopathologist who can provide an immediate fine needle aspiration (FNA) report. However, this has considerable resource implications and is not available in all units. In our department, surgeons perform FNAs guided by palpation. The FNA is evaluated for specimen adequacy by an on;site cytotechnician. This study evaluated the impact of the cytotechnician on the adequacy of neck lump FNA. FNA performed between June 2010 and February 2012 was examined. The FNA performed at a neck lump clinic with an assessment of adequacy by an on;site cytotechnician were considered the test group. All other neck lump FNAs from other sources without an assessment of adequacy by an on;site cytotechnician were considered the control group. Of the FNAs, 134 met the inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 87 FNAs (65%) were analysed for adequacy by the on;site cytotechnician and the remaining 47 (35%) were not. The results demonstrated an FNA inadequacy with and without on;site cytotechnician assessment of 29.9% and 40.4% respectively. This is equivalent to an absolute risk reduction of an inadequate FNA of 10.5%, which equates to a number needed to treat of 9.5, ie the cytotechnician needs to assess 9.5 (ie the cytotechnician [...] specimen).conclusions In neck lump clinics where on;site cytopathology is not available, an on;site cytotechnician is a compromise measure that does reduce the number of inadequate FNAs.
机译:简介评估颈部肿块的金标准是一站式诊所,并设有现场细胞病理学家,可提供即时细针穿刺(FNA)报告。但是,这具有相当大的资源含义,并且并非在所有单位中都可用。在我们部门,外科医生在触诊的指导下进行FNA。 FNA由现场细胞技术人员评估样品的适当性。这项研究评估了细胞技术人员对颈部肿块FNA是否足够的影响。检查了2010年6月至2012年2月之间执行的FNA。 FNA在颈部肿块诊所进行,并由现场细胞技术人员评估其是否适当,被视为测试组。未经现场细胞技术人员评估是否足够的其他来源的所有其他颈部肿块FNA被视为对照组。在FNA中,有134个符合本研究的纳入标准。其中,现场细胞技术人员对87个FNA(65%)进行了分析,而其余47个(35%)则没有。结果表明,现场和非现场细胞技术人员评估的FNA均不足,分别为29.9%和40.4%。等于将FNA不足10.5%的绝对风险降低,等于治疗9.5所需的数字,即细胞技术人员需要评估9.5(即细胞技术人员标本)。结论颈部肿块没有现场细胞病理学检查的诊所,现场细胞技术人员是一种折衷措施,确实可以减少不足的FNA数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号