首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England >Operative fixation for complex tibial fractures
【24h】

Operative fixation for complex tibial fractures

机译:复杂胫骨骨折的手术固定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION The management of open tibial shaft fractures remains challenging. Intramedullary nailing and external fixation are the most commonly used fixation techniques although the optimal fixation technique remains unresolved. In this article the outcomes of these two surgical techniques are compared.METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted through MEDLINE~R using Ovid~R and MeSH (Medical Subject Heading) terms for articles published in the English literature between 1999 and 2009. The outcome measures compared were time to fracture union, infection rates and complications.RESULTS Forty;one studies were identified, of which only three met the inclusion criteria. The average time to union was variable. Delayed union and non;union appeared to be more prevalent in the external fixator group although this was not statistically significant. Both techniques were associated with secondary procedures as well as infection.CONCLUSIONS The current literature indicates little evidence to suggest the superiority of one fixation technique over another for open tibial fractures.
机译:简介胫骨干开放性骨折的治疗仍然具有挑战性。髓内钉和外固定是最常用的固定技术,尽管最佳固定技术仍未解决。本文对这两种手术技术的结果进行了比较。方法通过MEDLINE〜R,使用Ovid〜R和MeSH(医学主题词)术语对英国文献中1999年至2009年发表的文章进行全面的文献检索。结果:40项研究被鉴定为一项研究,其中只有三项符合纳入标准。平均工会时间是可变的。延迟的联合和非联合似乎在外固定架组中更为普遍,尽管这在统计学上并不显着。两种技术均与继发手术以及感染相关。结论现有文献表明,很少有证据表明一种固定技术比开放性胫骨骨折优越。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号