首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England >Role of information available over the internet: what are the parents of children undergoing tonsillectomy likely to find?
【24h】

Role of information available over the internet: what are the parents of children undergoing tonsillectomy likely to find?

机译:互联网上可用信息的作用:正在进行扁桃体切除术的儿童的父母可能会找到什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the quality of information available on the world wide web to parents of children undergoing tonsillectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The main data source was from internet searches using the five most popular search engines and the keyword 'tonsillectomy' with default settings. The first 50 web links in each search were evaluated with the LIDA Instrument (assessing accessibility, usability and reliability criteria). We also assessed the readability of the sites using the Flesch reading ease score (FRES). RESULTS: Of the 250 possible links, 113 new links were included the remaining being repetitions, inactive links or restricted access sites. The websites had an average accessibility score of 42/63 (66.7%; range, 26-57), a usability score of 29/54 (53.7%; range, 7-49), and a reliability score of 17/51 (33.3%; range, 0-49). The Flesch reading ease score was 43.8 (range, 3-84.4). CONCLUSIONS: Health information available on the internet varies greatly. Highly ranked websites on popular search engines may not be the most reliable. Overall, the websites had low scores for reliability, with poor engagability, content production and conflict of interest declaration. Patients should be given previously assessed references on the internet to prevent them being misled by inaccurate or commercially motivated information.
机译:引言:本研究的目的是评估万维网上可供扁桃体切除术儿童家长使用的信息的质量。材料与方法:主要数据来源来自互联网搜索,使用五个最受欢迎的搜索引擎以及带有默认设置的关键字“扁桃体切除术”。使用LIDA工具评估了每次搜索中的前50个Web链接(评估可访问性,可用性和可靠性标准)。我们还使用Flesch阅读难易度评分(FRES)评估了网站的可读性。结果:在250个可能的链接中,包括113个新链接,其余为重复,无效链接或受限访问站点。这些网站的平均可访问性得分为42/63(66.7%;范围为26-57),可用性得分为29/54(53.7%;范围7-49)和可靠性得分为17/51(33.3) %;范围为0-49)。 Flesch阅读缓解得分为43.8(范围为3-84.4)。结论:Internet上可用的健康信息差异很大。热门搜索引擎上排名较高的网站可能不是最可靠的。总体而言,这些网站的可靠性得分很低,但可参与性,内容制作和利益冲突声明却很差。应该在互联网上为患者提供经过预先评估的参考资料,以防止患者被不正确或出于商业动机的信息所误导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号