The Trump administration's biggest actions were often deregulatory-rescinding or modifying the prior administration's recently issued rules. These moves frequently targeted the Obama administration's flagship environmental protections, including the Clean Power Plan, the Waters of the United States Rule, and its groundbreaking vehicle fuel economy and greenhouse gas standards-all of which, according to their cost-benefit analyses, were expected to provide hundreds of millions of net monetized benefits each year. Thankfully, in some of these cases, courts blocked the Trump actions, at least in part based on the administration's shoddy reasoning for moving away from CBA-justified policies. But if the commitment to CBA and what it represents is abandoned, there will be no protection from such regulatory swings in our increasingly polarized society.
展开▼
机译:特朗普政府最大的行动往往是放松管制——取消或修改前任政府最近颁布的规则。这些举措经常针对奥巴马政府的旗舰环境保护措施,包括《清洁能源计划》(Clean Power Plan)、《美国水域规则》(Waters of the United States Rule)及其开创性的汽车燃油经济性和温室气体标准——根据其成本效益分析,所有这些措施预计每年将提供数亿美元的净货币化收益。值得庆幸的是,在其中一些案件中,法院阻止了特朗普的行动,至少部分是基于政府放弃CBA合理政策的拙劣理由。但是,如果放弃对CBA的承诺及其所代表的内容,那么在我们日益两极分化的社会中,将无法免受这种监管波动的影响。
展开▼