首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England >Internal or external wall diameter for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening?
【24h】

Internal or external wall diameter for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening?

机译:内壁或外壁直径用于腹部主动脉瘤筛查?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The national abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programme measures internal wall diameter; however, current UK intervention criteria use external wall diameter. Our aim was to determine the clinical significance of the difference between these two measurements. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients on an aneurysm surveillance programme were ultrasound scanned by two experienced vascular scientists, blinded to the other's results. Maximum anteroposterior internal wall and maximum anteroposterior external wall diameters were measured. RESULTS: The median difference between internal and external diameter was 6 mm (IQR 6-7) for scientist 1 and 7 mm (IQR 5-8) for scientist 2. This was statistically significant (P < 0.0002). External wall diameter displayed less interobserver variability (3 mm vs 6 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Screening measurements underestimate aneurysm size by 6 mm and display greater variability in comparison to external wall measurements. These findings should be understood to prevent a delay in the detection and treatment of AAAs.
机译:简介:国家腹主动脉瘤(AAA)筛查程序可测量内壁直径;但是,当前英国的干预标准使用外壁直径。我们的目的是确定这两种测量方法之间差异的临床意义。患者和方法:两名有经验的血管科学家对50例接受动脉瘤监测程序的患者进行了超声扫描,而对另一种结果不知情。测量最大前后内壁和最大前后外壁直径。结果:科学家1的内外径的中位数差异为6 mm(IQR 6-7),科学家2的内径和外径之间的中位数差异为7 mm(IQR 5-8),这在统计学上具有统计学意义(P <0.0002)。外壁直径显示较少的观察者间差异(3毫米对6毫米)。结论:与外壁测量相比,筛查测量低估了6 mm的动脉瘤大小,并且显示出更大的变异性。应该理解这些发现以防止AAA的检测和治疗延迟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号