...
首页> 外文期刊>Lasers in surgery and medicine. >The comparison of the efficacy and safety of fractional 1064?nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser and nonablative fractional 1565?nm laser in the treatment of enlarged pores: A prospective split‐face study
【24h】

The comparison of the efficacy and safety of fractional 1064?nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser and nonablative fractional 1565?nm laser in the treatment of enlarged pores: A prospective split‐face study

机译:The comparison of the efficacy and safety of fractional 1064?nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser and nonablative fractional 1565?nm laser in the treatment of enlarged pores: A prospective split‐face study

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background and Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of fractional 1064?nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser and nonablative fractional 1565?nm laser in the treatment of enlarged pores. Study Design/Materials and Methods Twenty patients received five monthly treatments at months 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 and were followed up at months 5, 6, and 7. All patients were treated by fractional 1064?nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser (FxPico) on the left face, and nonablative fractional 1565?nm laser (ResurFx) on the right face as a control. Results For the 19 patients who completed the study, both sides demonstrated significant improvement on pore counts (p?
机译:抽象的背景和目标比较疗效和安全性的分数1064 ?皮秒激光和nonablative分数1565年?研究设计/材料和方法二十患者接受五个月的治疗个月0,1,2,3,4和随访月5、6和7。分数1064 ?(FxPico)左边的脸,和nonablative分数1565 ?面临的控制。完成这项研究,双方证明吗在孔隙方面显著改善< (p ? 0.01),而没有意义区别双方3 ?最终的治疗(p ? = 0.092)。FxPico一侧(57.9%)明显比ResurFx侧(36.8%)(p < ? 0.05)。皮脂分泌显著和卟啉的价值减少双方在五个治疗有一个更高的皮脂分泌减少ResurFx方面。这两种治疗方法的整体的满意度。侧(血管平均4.45±? 1.60)明显(平均高于FxPico的一边视觉模拟量表(血管)1.48 ? 1.36±?)(0.001 < p ?)。常见的不良反应和轻度至中度。有更高的发病率色素沉着过度的ResurFx侧(52.6%)相比之下,FxPico侧(5.3%)(0.001 < p ?)。皮秒激光和nonablative分数1565年?毛孔粗大的安全的治疗方案,而分数1064 ?更好地与更少的治疗的临床反应疼痛,恢复期短,低得多色素沉着过度的感应。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号