首页> 外文期刊>Vegetos: an international journal of plant research >Economic evaluation of agroforestry and non-agroforestry systems in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India
【24h】

Economic evaluation of agroforestry and non-agroforestry systems in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India

机译:印度北方邦东部农林业和非农林业系统的经济评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Agroforestry systems (AFs) deliver precious services and sustain biodiversity through ecological, social, and economic stability. Quantifying the economics of agroforestry and non-agroforestry systems is linked with farmer’s livelihood or forest-dwelling communities. In this context, the present study was conducted to explore various economic parameters, and related profitability between wheat agriculture system and Eucalyptus + wheat-based agroforestry systems in two districts (Prayagraj and Kaushambi) of Eastern UP (Uttar Pradesh), India. The cost of cultivation of crop production, related profitability and some marketing limitations faced by farmers was also recorded. A questionnaire survey method based on a pre-tested interview schedule was used for primary data collections from 160 farms respondents of wheat agriculture system and Eucalyptus + wheat-based AFs in Prayagraj and Kaushambi districts. The selected respondents were categorized into small, medium, and large farms as 52, 71, and 37 in Prayagraj and 45, 84, and 31 in Kaushambi. The cost of cultivation was followed in order: Rs. 42,213.15 ha−1 and 40,178.70 ha−1 (small farms) > Rs. 40,211.16 ha−1 and 37,793.35 ha−1 (medium farms) > Rs. 39,214.50 ha−1 and 36,791.30 ha−1 (large farms) in Prayagraj and Kaushambi, respectively. The B:C (benefit-cost) ratio was also followed in same trends as 1:1.60 and 1:1.65 (small farms) > 1:1.54 and1:1.60 (medium farms) > 1:1.51 and 1:1.58 (large farms) in wheat agriculture system and Eucalyptus + wheat-based AFs. But the value of gross income was reversed and followed the order: Rs. 67,733.50 ha−1 and 66,300.00 ha−1 (large farms) > Rs. 61,917.50 ha−1 and 60,546.00 ha−1 (medium farms) > Rs. 59,329.00 ha−1 and 58,124.00 ha−1 (small farms) in Prayagraj and Kaushambi, respectively. Similarly, the value of overall net income, farm business income, family labour income, and farm investment income were higher under Eucalyptus + wheat-based agroforestry system in Kaushambi than the wheat agriculture system in Prayagraj. Thus, the agroforestry systems seem to be promising practice in terms of economic, livelihood, and eco-environment sustainability point of view.
机译:抽象的农林复合经营系统(AFs)提供宝贵的服务和维持生物多样性通过生态、社会和经济上的稳定。农林复合经营和non-agroforestry系统与农民的生计森林社区。本研究是探索不同进行的经济参数,和相关的盈利能力小麦之间的农业系统桉树+麦农林复合经营系统两个地区(Prayagraj和Kaushambi)印度北方邦东部()。种植作物生产,相关的盈利能力和一些营销的限制农民也面临的记录。问卷调查方法基于预应力面试安排用于主要数据收集从160年农场小麦的受访者农业系统和桉树+麦AFs Prayagraj和Kaushambi地区。选择受访者分为小,中型和大型的农场,52岁,71年,37个Prayagraj 45, 84, 31日在Kaushambi。种植成本之后为了:Rs。42213 ha ha−−1和40178 .70 1(小农场)> Rs。(介质农场)> Rs。36791 .30公顷−1(大型农场)在Prayagraj和分别Kaushambi。率也跟着与1:1.60相同的趋势和1:1.65(小农场)> 1:1.54 and1:1.60(介质农场)> 1:1.51和1:1.58(大型农场)小麦农业系统桉树+麦AFs。总收入是逆转,随后订单:Rs。67733 .50 ha−1和66300公顷−1(大农场)> Rs。(介质农场)> Rs。58124公顷−1(小农场)在Prayagraj和分别Kaushambi。营业收入总体净利润,农场,家庭农场劳动收入,投资收入更高的桉树+下麦农林复合经营系统Kaushambi比小麦在Prayagraj农业系统。农林复合经营系统似乎是有前途的实践的经济、生活和生态环境可持续发展的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号