首页> 外文期刊>Bone marrow transplantation >Reduced-intensity vs myeloablative conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for patients aged over 45 years with ALL in remission: A study from the adult ALL working group of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (JSHCT)
【24h】

Reduced-intensity vs myeloablative conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for patients aged over 45 years with ALL in remission: A study from the adult ALL working group of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (JSHCT)

机译:45岁以上ALL缓解患者的强度降低与清髓性同种异体造血SCT:日本造血细胞移植学会(JSHCT)成人ALL工作组的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study, outcomes for 575 adult ALL patients aged ≥45 years who underwent first allo-SCT in CR were analyzed according to the type of conditioning regimen (myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for 369 patients vs reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) for 206 patients). Patients in the RIC group were older (median age, 58 vs 51 years, P<0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in 3-year OS, disease-free survival (DFS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM): 51% vs 53%, 47% vs 39% and 38% vs 36%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that CR2 and HLA mismatching were associated with poor OS (P=0.002 and P=0.019, respectively). HLA mismatching was associated with lower rate of relapse (P=0.016), but was associated with higher rate of NRM (P=0.001). RIC was associated with good OS and DFS in patients who received HLA-mismatch transplantation and were aged ≥55 years compared with MAC by multivariate analysis for each event with interaction (hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval 0.35 and 0.15-0.81, P=0.014 for OS and 0.36 and 0.16-0.81, P=0.013 for DFS). Therefore, patients ≥55 years of age with HLA-mismatch transplantation should be candidates for RIC rather than MAC.
机译:在这项研究中,根据适应症治疗方案的类型(369例患者的清髓适应性治疗(MAC)与206例低强度适应性治疗(RIC))分析了575例年龄≥45岁的成年ALL≥45岁的成人患者的结局。耐心)。 RIC组患者年龄较大(中位年龄58岁vs 51岁,P <0.0001)。 3年OS,无病生存期(DFS)和非复发死亡率(NRM)的差异无统计学意义:分别为51%对53%,47%对39%和38%对36%。多变量分析表明CR2和HLA错配与OS差有关(分别为P = 0.002和P = 0.019)。 HLA不匹配与较低的复发率相关(P = 0.016),但与较高的NRM发生率相关(P = 0.001)。 RIC与HLA错配移植且年龄≥55岁的患者与MAC的OS和DFS良好相关,通过多因素分析对每个事件进行交互分析(危险比(HR)和95%置信区间0.35和0.15-0.81,对于OS为P = 0.014,对于DFS为0.36和0.16-0.81,对于PFS为P = 0.013)。因此,年龄≥55岁的HLA错配移植患者应选择RIC而不是MAC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号