...
【24h】

Load to failure testing of new meniscal repair devices.

机译:加载失败测试的新半月板修复设备。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: New all-inside meniscal repair devices include those combining sutures with anchors and that allow for an "adjustable" repair. This study's purpose was to compare the failure strength of new meniscal repair devices with suture repairs. TYPE OF STUDY: Experimental laboratory biomechanical study. METHODS: A single repair was placed in a vertical longitudinal peripheral tear made in fresh adult porcine menisci. Group 1 had a vertically oriented suture using the FasT-Fix (Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Andover, MA) device. Group 2 had a horizontally oriented mattress suture using the FasT-Fix device. Group 3 had a repair using 2 Arthrex (Naples, FL) meniscal darts. The Group 4 repair used a RapidLoc (Mitek Surgical Products, Westwood, MA) device. The Group 5 repair used the Arthrotek meniscal screw (Biomet, Warsaw, IN). Group 6 had a single vertical suture, and group 7 a single horizontal suture, both of 2-0 Mersilene (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). Load to failure testing was performed. RESULTS: The vertical FasT-Fix suture had a mean load to failure of 70.9 N (1 SD +/- 33). The horizontal FasT-Fix suture had a mean load to failure of 72.1 N (+/- 23.5). The double Dart repair had a mean load to failure of 61.7 N (+/- 19). The RapidLoc repair had a mean load to failure of 43.28 N (+/- 3.98). The Arthrotek meniscal screw repair had a mean load to failure of 28.09 N (+/- 7.93). Failure occurred with device pullout of the inner rim (9 of 10) for the Darts, device pullout of the inner rim (6 of 10) and pullout of the outer rim (4 of 10) for the Arthrotek screw, and suture breakage for the FasT-Fix and the RapidLoc devices. The vertical sutures' mean load to failure was 80.43 N (+/- 8.5), and all 13 failed by suture breaking. The horizontal sutures' mean failure load was 55.9 N (+/- 18.8), and failure was by both suture breaking (6 of 10) and pulling through the meniscal tissue (4 of 10). CONCLUSIONS: Some of the newer meniscal repair devices show improved loads to failure over earlier generations.
机译:目的:新内半月板修复设备包括结合与锚和缝合允许一个“调”修复。研究的目的是比较失败的强度的新半月板修复设备缝合修复。实验室的生物力学研究。修复被放置在一个垂直的纵向外围撕裂了新鲜成年的猪半月板。使用权宜之计(Smith &侄子内窥镜检查,安多佛,MA)设备。面向床垫使用权宜之计缝合设备。(那不勒斯,FL)半月板飞镖。使用RapidLoc (Mitek外科产品,韦斯特伍德,MA)设备。Arthrotek半月板螺钉(Biomet,华沙)。6组有一个垂直缝和组7一个水平缝,2 - 0 Mersilene(Ethicon,萨默维尔市,NJ)。测试执行。权宜之计缝合平均负载的失败70.9 N (1 SD + / - 33)。缝合的平均失效到达负载72.1 N (+ / -23.5)。61.7 N的失败(+ / - 19)。的平均失效到达负载43.28 N(+ / - 3.98)。螺旋的Arthrotek半月板修复了的意思加载失败的28.09 N(+ / - 7.93)。发生的设备撤离内心的rim (910)的飞镖,设备内部的撤军rim 10(6)和撤军的外缘(410) Arthrotek螺丝,缝合断裂权宜之计和RapidLoc设备。垂直缝合线的平均失效到达负载为80.43N(+ / - 8.5),和所有13个失败的缝合打破。负载为55.9 N(+ / - 18.8),和失败的两种缝合打破10(6)和拉通过半月板组织10(4)。结论:一些较新的半月板修复设备显示改善加载失败前几代。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号