首页> 外文期刊>JACC. Clinical electrophysiology. >Trends in Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Insertion Between 1988 and 2018 in Olmsted County
【24h】

Trends in Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Insertion Between 1988 and 2018 in Olmsted County

机译:心血管植入电子的趋势设备插入在奥姆斯特德在1988年和2018年之间县

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES This study sought to describe trends in cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) insertion over the past 3 decades in Olmsted County. BACKGROUND Trends in CIED insertion in the United States have not been extensively studied. METHODS The Rochester Epidemiology Project is a medical records linkage system comprising the records of all residents of Olmsted County from 1966 to the present. CIED insertion between 1988 and 2018 was determined using International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision, International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision, and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Age-and sex-adjusted incidence rates, adjusted to the 2010 US White population, were calculated. Trends in incidence over time, across age groups, and between sex are estimated using Poisson regression models. RESULTS The age-and sex-adjusted incidence of device implants for the study period were as follows: overall CIED: 82.4 (95% CI: 79.2-85.6); permanent pacemaker (PPM): 62.9 (95% CI: 60.0-65.7); implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD): 14.0 (95% CI: 12.6-15.3); and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT): 5.6 (95% CI: 4.7-6.4) per 100,000 per year. The overall incidence of CIED insertion increased between 1988 to 1993 and 2000 to 2005 and then decreased between 2000 to 2005 and 2012 to 218 (P < 0.0001). PPM and ICD insertion incidence followed these trends, whereas the incidence of CRT insertion increased between 2000 to 2005 and 2012 to 2018. CIED insertion incidence increased with age (P < 0.0001). CIED insertion incidence was greater in men (116.3 vs 57.3 per 100,000 per year in men vs women; P < 0.0001). The overall survival of CRT recipients improved (P 1/4 0.0044). CONCLUSIONS The incidence values for PPM and ICD implants are decreasing, while the incidence of CRT implants is increasing. CIEDs are increasingly inserted in the elderly, men, and patients with higher comorbidities. (C) 2022 Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
机译:目的本研究试图描述的趋势心血管植入电子设备(cy)插入在过去的3年奥姆斯特德。插入在美国没有进行了广泛的研究。流行病学项目是一个医疗记录链接系统包含的记录所有的居民奥姆斯特德县从1966年到现在。1988年和2018年之间插入使用国际分类Diseases-Ninth修订,国际Diseases-10th分类修订当前程序的术语代码。sex-adjusted发病率,调整2010年美国白人人口,计算。在年龄组发病率随着时间的推移,,使用泊松之间性估计回归模型。sex-adjusted发病率的装置植入物研究期间如下:总体cy: 82.4(95%置信区间:79.2—-85.6);62.9(95%置信区间:60.0—-65.7);心律转复除颤器(ICD): 14.0(95%置信区间CI:12.6 - -15.3);(CRT): 5.6 (95% CI:直径4。4)为10万的一年。1988年到1993年和2000年到2005年之间增加然后2000年至2005年和2012年之间下降218 (P < 0.0001)。发病率是这些趋势,而CRT的发病率之间插入增加20002005年和2012年到2018年。发病率随着年龄的增加(P < 0.0001)。插入发病率在男性更大(116.3 vs57.3每100000人每年在男性和女性;0.0001)。改善(P 1/4 0.0044)。为PPM和ICD植入发病率值减少,而植入CRT的发病率正在增加。老年人,男性,患者高共病。美国心脏病学会的代表的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号