首页> 外文期刊>Annals of surgical oncology >Recommendation for subclass evaluation of TNM stage iva papillary thyroid carcinomas: T4aN1b patients are at risk for recurrence and survival.
【24h】

Recommendation for subclass evaluation of TNM stage iva papillary thyroid carcinomas: T4aN1b patients are at risk for recurrence and survival.

机译:TNM分期的乳头状甲状腺癌的亚类评估建议:T4aN1b患者有复发和生存的风险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although all tumor, node, metastasis system (TNM) stage IVA papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs) do not seem to behave equivalently as a result of various tumor and node stages, to our knowledge, subclass evaluation has never been attempted. METHODS: We reviewed 119 stage IVA PTC patients who underwent initial thyroidectomy with modified neck dissection as curative surgery at our institution (33 male patients, 86 female patients; age 61.6 years; follow-up 87.7 months). These patients were divided into groups A (T1-3N1b; n = 79), B (T4aN0-1a; n = 9), and C (T4aN1b; n = 31). Outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The rates of recurrence (P < .05) and disease mortality (P < .001) were 13.9% and 1.3%, 0% and 0%, and 35.5% and 19.4% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were 73.4% and 97.9%, 100% and 100%, and 54.9% and 69.7% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. DFS and DSS curves differed significantly between group A + B and group C (P < .005 and P < .0005, respectively). The relative risks of DFS and DSS in group C were 2.8-fold and 14.9-fold, respectively, compared with group A (P < .05), and 3.2-fold and 17.5-fold compared with group A + B (P < .01). Thus, outcomes were worse in group C. In multivariate analysis, esophageal invasion and lymphadenopathy were independent risk factors for both DFS and DSS in stage IVA PTC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes in stage IVA are not equivalent, and patients with T4aN1b are at greater risk for worse prognosis. Therefore, we recommend subclass evaluation for TNM stage IVA PTCs.
机译:背景:尽管所有肿瘤,淋巴结转移系统(TNM)期的IVA甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)表现出不同的肿瘤和淋巴结分期,但据我们所知,从未尝试进行亚类评估。方法:我们回顾了本院119例行改良甲状腺夹层初次甲状腺切除术作为治疗性手术的IVA PTC患者(男33例,女86例;年龄61.6岁;随访87.7个月)。这些患者分为A组(T1-3N1b; n = 79),B组(T4aN0-1a; n = 9)和C组(T4aN1b; n = 31)。比较两组之间的结果。结果:A,B和C组的复发率(P <.05)和疾病死亡率(P <.001)分别为13.9%和1.3%,0%和0%,35.5%和19.4%。 。 A,B和C组的10年无病生存率(DFS)和疾病特异性生存率(DSS)分别为73.4%和97.9%,100%和100%,54.9%和69.7%。 A + B组和C组之间的DFS和DSS曲线差异显着(分别为P <.005和P <.0005)。与A组相比,C组DFS和DSS的相对风险分别为2.8倍和14.9倍(P <.05),与A + B组相比,其DFS和DSS的相对风险分别为3.2倍和17.5倍(P <。 01)。因此,C组的预后更差。在多因素分析中,食管浸润和淋巴结病是IVA PTC期患者DFS和DSS的独立危险因素。结论:IVA分期的结果并不相同,T4aN1b患者的预后较差的风险更大。因此,我们建议对TNM阶段IVA PTC进行子类评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号