首页> 外文期刊>Annals of surgical oncology >Impact of total lymph node count and lymph node ratio on staging and survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a large, population-based analysis.
【24h】

Impact of total lymph node count and lymph node ratio on staging and survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a large, population-based analysis.

机译:胰腺癌胰腺切除术后总淋巴结计数和淋巴结比率对分期和生存的影响:一项基于人群的大型分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Based on data from other malignancies, the number of lymph nodes evaluated and the ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes (LNR) may be important predictors of survival. LNR has never been investigated in a large population-based study of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify 4005 patients who underwent resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 1988 to 2003. The effect of total lymph node count and LNR on survival was examined using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The median number of lymph nodes examined was seven; 390 (10.1%) patients had no lymph nodes examined. Of those patients who had at least one lymph node examined, 1507 (43.3%) had no lymph node metastases (N0) and 1971 (56.7%) had metastatic nodal disease (N1). Overall median survival was 13 months, and 5-year survival was 6.8%. N1 disease was associated with a worse 5-year survival compared with N0 disease (4.3 vs 11.3%, respectively, P < .001). Patients with N0 disease could be further stratified based on the number of lymph nodes evaluated (median survival: 1-11 nodes, 16 months vs 12 or more nodes, 23 months; P < .001). For N1 patients, LNR was one of the most powerful factors associated with survival (LNR > 0-0.2, 15 months; LNR > 0.2-0.4, 12 months; LNR > 0.4, 10 months) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients have an inadequate number of lymph nodes evaluated following pancreatic surgery. N0 patients who have fewer than 12 lymph nodes examined may be understaged. In patients with N1 disease, LNR may better substratify patients with regard to prognosis.
机译:背景:基于来自其他恶性肿瘤的数据,评估的淋巴结数目以及转移性淋巴结与被检查淋巴结的比例(LNR)可能是生存率的重要预测指标。 LNR从未在有关胰腺腺癌患者的大规模人群研究中进行过研究。方法:使用监测,流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库来鉴定4005例从1988年至2003年接受胰腺癌切除的患者。使用单因素和多因素分析检查了总淋巴结计数和LNR对生存的影响。结果:检查的淋巴结的中位数为七个。 390名(10.1%)患者未检查淋巴结。在那些至少检查了一个淋巴结的患者中,有1507个(43.3%)没有淋巴结转移(N0),而1971年(56.7%)没有转移性淋巴结病(N1)。总体中位生存期为13个月,5年生存率为6.8%。与N0疾病相比,N1疾病的5年生存率较差(分别为4.3对11.3%,P <.001)。 N0病患者可根据评估的淋巴结数目进一步分层(中位生存期:16个月为1-11个结节,而23个月为12个或更多结节; P <0.001)。对于N1患者,LNR是与生存相关的最有力因素之一(LNR> 0-0.2,15个月; LNR> 0.2-0.4,12个月; LNR> 0.4,10个月)(P <.001)。结论:大多数患者在胰腺手术后评估的淋巴结数目不足。 N0淋巴结少于12例的患者可能处于低阶段。对于患有N1疾病的患者,LNR在预后方面可能会更好地使患者细分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号