首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Surgery >Eye metrics as an objective assessment of surgical skill.
【24h】

Eye metrics as an objective assessment of surgical skill.

机译:眼睛指标是对手术技能的客观评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Currently, surgical skills assessment relies almost exclusively on subjective measures, which are susceptible to multiple biases. We investigate the use of eye metrics as an objective tool for assessment of surgical skill. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Eye tracking has helped elucidate relationships between eye movements, visual attention, and insight, all of which are employed during complex task performance (Kowler and Martins, Science. 1982;215:997-999; Tanenhaus et al, Science. 1995;268:1632-1634; Thomas and Lleras, Psychon Bull Rev. 2007;14:663-668; Thomas and Lleras, Cognition. 2009;111:168-174; Schriver et al, Hum Factors. 2008;50:864-878; Kahneman, Attention and Effort. 1973). Discovery of associations between characteristic eye movements and degree of cognitive effort have also enhanced our appreciation of the learning process. METHODS: Using linear discriminate analysis (LDA) and nonlinear neural network analyses (NNA) to classify surgeons into expert and nonexpert cohorts, we examine the relationship between complex eye and pupillary movements, collectively referred to as eye metrics, and surgical skill level. RESULTS: Twenty-one surgeons participated in the simulated and live surgical environments. In the simulated surgical setting, LDA and NNA were able to correctly classify surgeons as expert or nonexpert with 91.9% and 92.9% accuracy, respectively. In the live operating room setting, LDA and NNA were able to correctly classify surgeons as expert or nonexpert with 81.0% and 90.7% accuracy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate, in simulated and live-operating environments, that eye metrics can reliably distinguish nonexpert from expert surgeons. As current medical educators rely on subjective measures of surgical skill, eye metrics may serve as the basis for objective assessment in surgical education and credentialing in the future. Further development of this potential educational tool is warranted to assess its ability to both reliably classify larger groups of surgeons and follow progression of surgical skill during postgraduate training.
机译:目的:目前,手术技能评估几乎完全依赖于主观措施,这容易受到多种偏见的影响。我们调查使用眼指标作为评估手术技能的客观工具。发明内容背景数据:眼睛跟踪已经帮助阐明了眼睛运动,视觉注意力和洞察力之间的关系,在复杂任务执行过程中都采用了这些关系(Kowler and Martins,Science。1982; 215:997-999; Tanenhaus等,Science。 1995; 268:1632-1634; Thomas和Lleras,Psychon Bull Rev. 2007; 14:663-668; Thomas和Lleras,Cognition。2009; 111:168-174; Schriver等,Hum Factors。2008; 50:864 -878; Kahneman,《注意与努力》(1973年)。发现特征性眼动与认知努力程度之间的关联也增强了我们对学习过程的欣赏。方法:使用线性判别分析(LDA)和非线性神经网络分析(NNA)将外科医生分为专家组和非专家组,我们研究了复杂的眼睛和瞳孔运动之间的关系,统称为眼睛指标和手术技能水平。结果:21名外科医生参加了模拟和现场手术环境。在模拟的手术环境中,LDA和NNA能够分别以91.9%和92.9%的准确度将外科医生正确地分类为专家还是非专家。在现场手术室中,LDA和NNA能够分别将外科医生正确分类为专家或非专家,准确度分别为81.0%和90.7%。结论:我们证明,在模拟和实时操作环境中,眼图指标可以可靠地将非专家与专家外科医生区分开。由于当前的医学教育者依赖于外科技能的主观测量,因此眼科指标可以作为将来进行外科手术教育和认证的客观评估的基础。有必要进一步开发这种潜在的教育工具,以评估其对大型外科医师进行可靠分类的能力以及在研究生培训期间跟踪手术技能进展的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号